Uraguay and Argentina are paradoxically extremely racist striken countries.....also so is Brazil (even more surprisingly). Argentina in particular had hunting niggas as a sport
Suarez may not be racist in the strictest sense, but, in conformance with his ruthless character will use anything to get ahead....diving, cheating, biting etc. Hence, his
intentions are a bigger picture than whether or not he was guilty of racism or not....and in this context he attempted to use race to hurt Evra....which is akin of using his teeth to hurt a defender. Using race to hurt someone, to a layman like me, is the definition of racism.
Also I find it hilarious that everyone else is an expert on racism on this forum except myself and Corzoli....who happen to be black
Everyone else can define what is racist and what isn't but we get practically run out of town whenever we speak on the issue.
Apparently you are racist if you disapprove of a Milanista kicking a ball at the crowd, but it's cool to shit on Seedorf every game he plays, call him shit and lazy and various other comments about his ass
...Meanwhile Pirlo WAS actually playing shit AND being a fucking lazy jaded mercenary ladri cunt but it's always
"Grazie Maestro Milan legend
"
So now that Pirlo has fucking come out and said "hey I actually didn't give a fuck about Milan post 2006" the questions remain:
Was I seeing things when I commented that this is what Pirlo was doing?
Was I making up that Pirlo was indeed playing more shit than Seedorf but getting less boo's by the "totally not racist" Italian fans?
how come it's often the black players that get the boo's for playing shit?
Does anyone ever remember Pirlo getting boo-ed? I don't. Not even after the 2008 horror show vs Arsenal