Kaka - Caroline + Cristiano - Irina = ???
When in top form, I think he was better than Messi and Ronaldo in top form.
When in top form, I think he was better than Messi and Ronaldo in top form.
When in top form, I think he was better than Messi and Ronaldo in top form.
Not even with jesus possessing him.
But when at their peak, I'd pick Kaka' over these two any day of the week.
Two men attracted to each other minus their beards.Kaka - Caroline + Cristiano - Irina = ???
That is your opinion. I suggest you keep it to yourself if you're only try to belittle the opinions of others without much reasoning ...
Read through again - I was referring to when they were in top form. Ronaldo is already on the decline and Messi will soon follow - if not already. The two of them were more consistent for a longer period of time, and one wonders how a growth hormone deficient kid can remain injury-free for such long spells ...
But when at their peak, I'd pick Kaka' over these two any day of the week.
When in top form, I think he was better than Messi and Ronaldo in top form.
When at his peak, Kaka was certainly more great to watch than Cron but not at all close to Messi.
For sure he was great to watch. I'd watch him over Ronaldo. That doesnt mean he was better though.
'Better' is largely a useless word to use when debating this topic. It's all far too subjective. I only care about whose game pleased me more.
'Better' refers to pretty much every footballing statistic you can think of in this case - the least subjective thing.
Whereas, what you describe as pleasing is ironically the most subjective thing.
You are confusing 'Successful' and 'Effective' for 'Better'. Cristiano has had a far more successful and more effective career than Kaka. It's an output judgement - that's what statistics make.
'Better' is something with many more layers. For me, 'better' always remain a slightly childish thing to say in a football debate. Footballers will always have their own style, circumstances, choice of clubs etc. There's no better or worse.
Pleasing is the most personal way to describe how a footballer's game has affected you. I've long since discarded attempts to compare how one player affects one against how the same player affects a different person. For me, therefore, footballers are best evaluated by how they please me in whatever aspects I like while watching football. Kaka's game pleases me a lot more than Cristiano's. And that's really all that matters to me. Not Kaka's career choices or goals scored.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EwViQxSJJQ#congo = #kanyewest
You are confusing 'Successful' and 'Effective' for 'Better'. Cristiano has had a far more successful and more effective career than Kaka. It's an output judgement - that's what statistics make.
'Better' is something with many more layers. For me, 'better' always remain a slightly childish thing to say in a football debate. Footballers will always have their own style, circumstances, choice of clubs etc. There's no better or worse.
Pleasing is the most personal way to describe how a footballer's game has affected you. I've long since discarded attempts to compare how one player affects one against how the same player affects a different person. For me, therefore, footballers are best evaluated by how they please me in whatever aspects I like while watching football. Kaka's game pleases me a lot more than Cristiano's. And that's really all that matters to me. Not Kaka's career choices or goals scored.