I was going to take the high road and not respond but there’s simply too much stupidity in this post that deserves calling out and public ridicule
You'd need some directions to the highroad first.
So according to your logic, Cancer Specialists shouldn’t be treating Cancer patients unless they’ve experienced the disease themselves? They should just let them die right? Also, Doctor’s should just ignore the horrific consequences of drug addiction they see on a daily basis because they haven’t got high themselves? If we followed your warped logic we’d have a world without Doctor’s
That's not my logic at all^^ It's not even close.
Oh really? And where exactly did you get those garbage stats from? Your ass or did the tooth fairy whisper them in your ear when you were high?
As you can very well see I have in fact not given any stats at all. It's just a general statement of mine.
Wrong again. Plenty of rehab centres are run by medical professionals and therapists who have never experienced drug addiction themselves. So according to you, psychiatrists who’ve never experienced mental illness should stop treating mental health patients right?
I've never said they aren't being run by so called 'medical professionals'.
No one in the world has gone through life without mental illness so good luck finding such a psychiatrist.
Also, the scientists who analyse these substances in a lab and test their efficacy in controlled experiments also need to find a new job.
Test their efficacy? And how would one go about finding that out.... If they only use it on other test subjects then, yes, they should definitely find a new job as they're ill suited for this one. All of the information lies in the effect so they can't really test it themselves without taking them. Feels like I'm having to repeat myself here but w/e. If you wanna go this slowly to have a chance, fine.
So a Scientist’s opinion is invalid if they haven’t tried illegal substances themselves?
Their opinion on the effects they have on your mind? Abso-fucking-lutely. Legal, not legal, doesn't matter.
They should just ignore their own scientific studies which prove drug addiction damages the brain and causes a host of other medical problems?
This is a blatant lie altogether^ and therefore have no bearing here.
Only a real idiot would follow your advice if they knew of the dangers beforehand.
Only a real idiot would listen to the guy acting like an authority on the subject he got no knowledge nor experience in. A smart man would find out for himself.
I guess you also think Scientists should stop testing medications and treatments on lab rats and test it on themselves instead?
Absolutely. Testing it on an unwilling subject is a deplorable crime.
OK, so enlighten me, why are drugs banned if not for the horrendous damage they do to individuals and society as a whole? I guess the Illuminati just want to keep us all under their little thumb right?
Illuminati? Don't be so daft. Psychedelics are banned for the very reasons I've argued all this time. If you haven't got it by now, you never will
but I’m willing to bet the majority of the worlds population have never taken drugs.
Again, where’s your evidence supporting this claim or were you high again when you wrote this?
This was by far the funniest part in this mess^^ I hope for obvious reasons.
Lol so a bunch of Shamans in South America and Africa constitute a significant proportion of the worlds population? OK
You were insinuating that ones cash flow somehow relates to ones need to develop oneself. That's really stupid in my book.
Lol it’s YOU who failed epically as you still can’t understand my original response. I meant that literally nobody thought 40m for the best RW in Serie A for 2 seasons running was a bad investment. Anyway, it certainly wasn’t “a lot of people” as you suggested which again is a figure pulled straight from your rear end.
Ooooh so now all of a sudden you meant something completely different to what you actually wrote? How convenient
Also, 'literally'(pubes fb) a lot of people did think that, no matter how much they'd want to erase that fact now. And! The kicker here... I haven't mentioned any figures whatsoever my semi-literate friend.
Let us quickly go through past and present again. Past tense means it's in the past, AND, present means now. kk?
Why are you bringing everyday items such as orange juice into a discussion about hallucinogenic drugs?
Because it gives a good contrast to the argument.
It’s got nothing to do with it.
Oh but it does.
You ridiculed claims people can become addicted to hallucinogens only to backtrack and admit it was possible.
I did no such thing
Nice attempted deflection though
Gonna quote you on this one^^