Intelligent people dont end up homeless
I don't know about that....seems some very intelligent people ended up hopeless.
http://www.businessinsider.com/formerly-homeless-people-who-became-famous-2012-6?op=1&IR=T
I think the correct thing to say is intelligent people don't stay homeless
He gives his thoughts on TNA theyre just thoughts.What I will say and I don't think you can disagree , is with the talent theyve had and the 12.5 years theyve been around , the exposure ...they should be doing better than they are , they should be doing better than half full tiny arenas with no house shows and guys only working a few times a month.
I hope that the spike thing was a reality check and they start to be smarter and prosper.
but what has their business results got to do with liking them or being fair to them?
do you look at apples stock results to decide if you like the latest iphone?
do you look at a musicians album sales to decide if they have music you wanna listen to?
tna's business decisions should be irrelevant, just like the arena's they use or the amount of people that attend. what matters is the product and if it's any good.
if you believe meltzer tna has always had a shitty product, because he has spent the best part of 14 years telling everyone they suck.
just contrast tna coverage between meltzer and crew with other wrestling media like pwinsider and you the difference and the agenda.
Because he left TNA
and because he's AJ he is a great wrestler.TNA dicked him about and it worked out better for he.
you are proving my point
so clearly tna isn't a career killer and meltzer is wrong again
Damn you're not stupid , you know he means in the US and with regards to having a WWE run to get some money or actually be a hit.Gallows is just great
ok so now he means only in the us?
name me one non wwe wrestler in the US that makes more then a tna maineventer with only US bookings
srsly name one
how can tna be a career killer when their wrestlers earn more then 90% of wrestlers in america
if he said "tna will hurt your chances of wrestling in the wwe" I might agree, but that would be an example of wwe's crappy hiring practices more then anything else.
No they are not.They are doing it fine.
You said it 19 yrs ago the Crow thing started , hes mid 50's cant go looks like shite and he cant talk too good neither WHAT he cant talk no good neither...Theyre using him fine less is more , especially with Sting.
mic skills are irrelevant, he didn't even talk during the crow days
looks are irrelevant because his body is covered by a trench coat.
how he can go is also irrelevant because he doesn't have to wrestle.
have him in the rafters ffs not the locker room area or entrance way
drop the lights and have better titantron vids. kinda like the wyatts.
have him in the rafters with a falcon/vulture like he has in wcw
do the decoy sting invasion angle with look-alike stings invading the ring through the crowd
if you are impressed with the way wwe then I really don't know what to say.
the greatest star to never wrestle for wwe and this is the way they introduce him on raw