Why is Biglia rated so high?
He played well in Lazio, but back then Lazio had several average players which made a great team. I can't understand how come Mirabelli - who is supposed to be smarter than us in terms of rating footballers - fell for that and bought Biglia for millions while he was decent only because he played in a well-organised team. In a team like that even average players are overperforming - like Nocerino for example.
Can you imagine anyone buying Nocerino back in 2012 for ~15 millions? I can't. And Mirabelli bought someone like him - an average player after a good season in a good team - to build a midfield around him. What a stupidity.
For now I don't agree that Locatelli from
16/17 season is worse than current Biglia and what's more - Locatelli can still grow a lot. Therefore selling him is a pure stupidity - even bigger if we're gonna give his spot to this
average, overpayed argentinian or another average playmaker - Badelj.
Hell, after last few years I can't see any difference between Biglia, Montolivo and Badelj. Each one of them has his strong sides, each one of them needs to play constantly to find his best form and yet first we splashed millions on Biglia while having Montolivo and Locatelli (can't see any difference between buying Biglia and burning this money up in a fireplace) and now we're gonna sell Locatelli for peanuts only to keep Monto and Biglia - which is stupid - and still we are looking for Badelj.
Can't find strong enough words to explain how stupid it is.