Didn't someone say Zaracho is an Argentinean Lucas Paqueta
Watching Napoli defend was 3 times more interesting than this Real-City snooze fest
Guardiola often switches to negative tactics in important CL games in the knockout stages.
The Bitch plays like crap... Too bad we will miss so many starters in the Coppa game
Watching Napoli defend was 3 times more interesting than this Real-City snooze fest
first half of napoli-barca was craaazy boring
The player that I’d most like to play the AM role in our 4231 is Lorenzo Pellegrini. He has improved so much in the last couple of seasons and he’s one of the most creative players around.
He can score and assist, is two footed and hard working with experience of playing as a mezz’ala and even in a double pivot. He fits the profile of the type of player that I think we should go for in that he can play both AM and mezz’ala giving us versatility, workrate and quality to boot.
I’ve read that he’s having trouble with Roma in contract talks so maybe we should keep an eye on his situation.
Let's not pretend his team are being purposefully shit.
Napoli defended well and countered. City are turgid. Madrid are just as shit.
Frankly, Napoli and Bayern have been the only teams this week to not look shit (haven't seen Lyon but it's not hard to look good vs Sorri)
Embarrassing? They were the better side in chances.How can you say that, Napoli was so embarrassing to watch.
Lorenzo Pellegrini is a very good player. For €25m, I'd take him over Zaracho.
There wasn't any capital loss on Piatek. In fact, we recorded a very small capital gain.
Hertha Berlin paid €27m + bonuses (per Di Marzio who initially broke the Piatek - Hertha story).
Piatek's book value at the time we sold him was approx. €27m, hence why the Milan mgmt were reluctant to sell/loan him for a figure lower than the aforementioned number.
No capital loss on Piatek. You have to calculate the ammorization.
Do you know what is ammorization?23m+bonus according to Kicker and Bild, who claimed that Italian papers had got it wrong. They have great insight into dealings of Bundesfodder clubs. Di Marzio on the other hand is no longer a mouthpiece and scout/advisor for the Milan CEO(Galliani). No different to the other transfer gurus. He has already got the details of one Milan-Bundesfodder deal wrong this season(Rebic's).
23m, 27m, it's still a capital loss since it's less than the original purchase price.
That's the actual definition of it. I know that the commode is using CalcioMercato re-definition of plusvalenza, which is why I added "end of". That definition might be appropriate for certain matters, but not overall.
You don't get a clean slate once the year is over. There are and will be more (negative) consequences to the 146m loss last year.
Do you know what is ammorization?
Of course.Yes, assuming you meant amortization . It's what the likes of CalcioMercato base their re-definition of plusvalenza on.
Is it supposed to refute my point?
Even if there would be plusvalenza in the current fiscal year because you sold the player above his current book value (purchase price minus the yearly amortizations), the amortization still impacts your profit (amortization / player value X).Do you know what is ammorization?
23m, 27m, it's still a capital loss since it's less than the original purchase price.
That's the actual definition of it. I know that the commode is using CalcioMercato re-definition of plusvalenza, which is why I added "end of". That definition might be appropriate for certain matters, but not overall.
Maurizio Sarri: "In Italy, we would've had 2 penalties in our favour."
Embarrassing? They were the better side in chances.
Allowing Barca to have possession is something every team will do.
Jeez