Centre
Milan Icon
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,961
- Reaction score
- 0
crazymilangirl said:Id wanna try what Berlusconi smokes though...
Whatever hes got must be good.
crazymilangirl said:Id wanna try what Berlusconi smokes though...
How can you talk that bad about Vagner Love...the forward of love? (don't worry I also think he is crap, but I never get tired of calling him "the forward of love").Ronaldo9 said:I really have no clue what the fuck is Dunga thinking not calling up Ronaldo. Vagner Love and Sobis are absolute crap.
Nothing special. He missed a sitter and didn't do much else. Overall, KaPaRo were invisible today.prokeneda said:I missed the game against Atlanta, how did Pato performed ?
Olympic games.Beemer said:Nothing special. He missed a sitter and didn't do much else. Overall, KaPaRo were invisible today.
Ronaldo will not be called up for the NT until he's fully back in game shape. Why Pato is being called up after one good match (he's had two mediocre ones since then), I'm not sure.
Nielsenb41 said:Have you seen the games he played in Brazil? It's not like italian defenders got an extra leg or anything. The boy was a star in Brazil, he was tightly marked. I agree Udinese played a really good game, specially the defense, but I think we can ask more because I know he can give us more. It's not like I'm trying to put even more pressure on him or hype this thing even more, I just think that we should set the bar up high, otherwise we"ll be licking his feet after every so-so game, because he can't do much worse than against Udi. Afterall, in Brazil he's already considered the heir to Romário's and Ronaldo's #9 shirt.
And of course he'll get better, he's only 18 afterall. But in no way he's "not complete". I've never seen a striker that can shoot with both feet, head the ball like that, has such a fine first-touch and control, pace and dribbling skills, being called incomplete.
I agree he has a long way to go, what I meant is that despite being 18 he already has more "tools" at his disposal than most strikers in the world. I think it's fine to expect a lot from the boy, specially if you got to see him playing in Brazil. I don't think Ancelotti and Galliani are making up things when they talk about his performances in training.slouchoncouch said:Look Pato's good, that we can accept from what we have seen so far and the fact that he wears a Milan shirt. Patience is what we require before we decide how good he is. Based on what we have seen so far he's got a way to go before he's up to speed with messi, Aguero, fabregas, C Ronaldo etc. To compare him with Ronaldo, Romario etc is crazy and seems premature. They are legends and Pato still has to prove that he has the ability to become a legend. The potential probably but we need time maybe a 2-3 years to compare him with kaka, messi and co. and a few more years after that and we can compare him with Ronaldo, Romario, Zidane etc.
Matmil04 said:I just cant believe you already started to criticize Ancelotti about how to play Pato and how he is wasting the kid's talent. You just saw 2 bad games by Pato! it's ridiculous to say Ancelotti is ruining him....what if now Pato goes on and score 10 goals before the end of the season ? would you start to hail how Ancelotti is a super coach ? that's just prejudgemental and atleast try to be reasonable.
I think you got it all wrong. Being told to use your ability effectively doesnt mean to change your way of playing, i know that Pato needs space to explore his potential and to be able to do that he needs time but that doesnt mean he has to do whatever he wants with ball + losing the ball 5 or 6 times carelessly wont help in any way both cases. What Ancelotti is trying to do is helping him develop fast enough so that he can produce the goods as soon as possibile, meaning advicing him to avoid meaningless tricks and flicks when it is not necessary(we have seen Pato dribbling far away from the opponents goal Vs Napoli and losing it ) and telling him to concretely use his skills in effective way so that the team will benifits from it.J.Rome said:Are you kidding me!?!?!?
Did you see the Napoli game...Pato attacked the hell out of them. But did you see how many times he lost the ball at least 5 or 6.
In both the Udinese & Atalanta game he didn't try even half as many attempts against his defenders...you're telling me he just stopped!?!?!
“We need to introduce Pato gradually,” Ancelotti warned. “He had a good game but we need to teach him how to play in this team.”
The above is a quote from Ancelotti, and IMO it means that he wasn't playing within the team in his debut against Napoli when he was trying to attack all game.
I bet these past two games he's been playing within the team/game plan though, just like everyone else he's passing it back to Pirlo & waiting for the lob.
Even if he did decide himself to stop taking on defenders because of whatever reason, Ancelotti should be encouraging him to continue to use his creativity and try to beat defenders.
Either way the kid should be told repeatedly to attack even if he loses the ball 5 or 6 times like he did against Napoli. We did better in that game with him attacking and losing the ball then we did in the past two games with him not attacking.
Matmil04 said:I think you got it all wrong. Being told to use your ability effectively doesnt mean to change your way of playing, i know that Pato needs space to explore his potential and to be able to do that he needs time but that doesnt mean he has to do whatever he wants with ball + losing the ball 5 or 6 times carelessly wont help in any way both cases. What Ancelotti is trying to do is helping him develop fast enough so that he can produce the goods as soon as possibile, meaning advicing him to avoid meaningless tricks and flicks when it is not necessary(we have seen Pato dribbling far away from the opponents goal Vs Napoli and losing it ) and telling him to concretely use his skills in effective way so that the team will benifits from it.
The situation we are in is another case why we cant afford to waste chances when they come begging(Pato's occasion vs Atalanta)especially we cant afford to see Pato losing the ball so many times as we dont seem capable enough to regain possesion with ease.
You cant possibily take on the defenders everytime they come to press you, and as you already know that when we played against Udinese and Atalanta they were defending in 10 and used counter-attack to hurt us, that means Pato had always have 2 defenders coming back at him everytime he had the ball so he was pressurised to give the ball back to his team mates and had no chance to dribble them as he would have liked.But, I saw about at least 4 or 5 times that Pato got the ball and he just passed it back out when I'm sure he could have taken on his man. And I'd be surprised if he wasn't instructed to do this. Ancelotti's words basically tell that he must have.
Unlike the last 2 teams, Napoli came to San Siro to play their game and that means there were spaces infront that Ronaldo and Pato explored perfectly. however everytime we lost the ball we were all over the place and the defence had to deal with lavezzi's speed many times + was the main reason why we concided 2 goals.He lost the ball 5-6 times in that Napoli game...BUT WE WON 5 -2, so I can live with that.
You should watch the first half again.Matmil04 said:dont get me wrong Pato played greatly but showed his ability only just after he scored.
And I agree with you, he can and should play it simple sometimes. We can see he's skilled from a single shot, or a simple run. That's why I said he showed his ability in the first half.Matmil04 said:Nielsenb41, am not arguing to degrade Pato's performance, he was fenomenal vs Napoli in certain moments. The thing that i was trying to say is to tell J.Rome that Pato doesnt necessarily have to dribble every single time to show his skill. Period.