Says who?
Goal.com
There is not ONE credible evidence of this actually happening. Heck, go read the goddamn article again - they cite absolutely no evidence whatsoever
just wait
Says who?
Goal.com
There is not ONE credible evidence of this actually happening. Heck, go read the goddamn article again - they cite absolutely no evidence whatsoever
Here's the biggest problem to get pep. To get pep e need investors.
To get investors, berlusconi needs to sell. Berlusconi has built a global brand, but general weakness of serie A makes it an unattractive investment. Even city or chelsea with much less 'brand' have more to offer because fo gigantic EPL profits
Explain PSG then?
Or Anzhi or any of the Russian or Ukranian teams?
He can't
we'll see if psg proves to be a smart investment. They are losing money now. That's for sure.
russian and ukranian teams pay low wages. Look at wage bills/operating expenses v. ours.
Obviously exceptions like an etoo but rest... not so much.
tell me again how bush perpetrated 9/11
Its fair to say that EPL is more intresseting to invest in but we have seen american investors in Roma and chinese investors at Inter. Milan as a brand has still a very high value, so getting investors shouldnt be that difficult. Getting investors that suits either Milans or Berlusconis, possible both, demands is probably a bit trickier
Yes but the discussion was about a potential investment in Milan who plays in Serie A. Its harder to get investors to the league but that doesnt mean its impossible task to achive. Even more so in Milan case because as a global brand we are probably ranked highest of any Serie A team and top 5-6 in the world
It depends on what you mean with profitability. If you are talking about financial profit its extremly rare amongst football clubs to actually make the owner profit from the activity that involves owning a football club. Most investors does it for other reasons
LEt em clear it up for you ....
Thaksin paid something around 85 million pounds for City. He had his assets frozen. Shiek mansour bought them for $330 dollars, which at the time would have been a little less than 200 million pounds.
Considering they are a premier league club with ability to generate huge revnue to tv contracts, it's a steal. 2008 epl was already selling like crazy
Abramovich paid maximimum pof 150 million pounds for chelsea. That was like 60 to owners and 90 covering debt. That was 2003
Qatari's are said to have paid around $100 mil ($ not euros) for control of PSG.
The russian clubs? Sold for FAR FAR LESS....
As for selling full control. What does Berlusconi want. 1 billion? Isn't milan's value somewhere in that realm? Forbes values it at $838 (dollars).
so let me ask you, what business man in his right mind is paying that for a dying brand when you can buy an epl club for half or 1/3rd the price, build it up, and guarentee escalating revenue's because EPL profits increase EVERY YEAR
Use your heads
nobody is going to pay even 600 million plus to buy a club which has no stadium, probably is in the worst league ever and cannot be the godfather of that club .. whatever sheikhs do they cant eclipse berlus history.
I dont know whats the motivation behind buying a club like milan .. may be they are too rich and just want to fuck around
i dont think this forum is going to buy any shares if listed
its too complicated for such an institution
FUUUUUU sell the club .. I hope best comes out of it but its not so easy as people here claim
They want to own a big club. Competition with Dubai, other emirates.
Sheikh Mansoor is a cousin of this dude. This Qatar guy is the real deal. He wants a top grade club with a history to be bought. That is the only motivation.
LEt em clear it up for you ....
Thaksin paid something around 85 million pounds for City. He had his assets frozen. Shiek mansour bought them for $330 dollars, which at the time would have been a little less than 200 million pounds. Edit- double checked (http://www.x-rates.com/average/?from=USD&to=GBP&amount=1&year=2008). Pound was 2 to 1 in that period. Aka 165 million pounds
Considering they are a premier league club with ability to generate huge revnue to tv contracts, it's a steal. 2008 epl was already selling like crazy
Abramovich paid maximimum pof 150 million pounds for chelsea. That was like 60 to owners and 90 covering debt. That was 2003
Qatari's are said to have paid around $100 mil ($ not euros) for control of PSG.
The russian clubs? Sold for FAR FAR LESS....
As for selling full control. What does Berlusconi want. 1 billion? Isn't milan's value somewhere in that realm? Forbes values it at $838 (dollars).
so let me ask you, what business man in his right mind is paying that for a dying brand when you can buy an epl club for half or 1/3rd the price, build it up, and guarentee escalating revenue's because EPL profits increase EVERY YEAR
Serie A's either got to turn it around, or Berlusconi has to sell for far cheaper, or option C (which is berlusconi's idea and makes complete sense) a european superleague has to come to fruition and thus kill domestic leagues
Use your heads
he could turn ses, pato, bojan etc into great stars!!!!!
he could turn ses, pato, bojan etc into great stars!!!!!