Kaka92
Gae
I don't know why people take every rumor so seriously. Relax.
I don't know why people take every rumor so seriously. Relax.
Honestly, I have doubts about whether Rangnick can do the same thing here, especially as the "Red Bull model" involved having several satellite clubs that required a lot of money to fund the infrastructure rather than just the transfers, which is a cost people sort of forget.
I wonder if Lille will be our Salzburg? Who knows.
I will say this about Rangnick, though. I'm glad we've seemingly committed to some project style, or at least, I hope so. I think Maldini and Boban, if given more time, would have identified enough players, that they would have an impressive enough team to qualify through talent (I mean, you sign enough Theos, Bennacers, and win some gambles on Rebics, and you'll get there).
Rangnick is being brought in to restructure the entire club's sporting approach. Perhaps his approach is truly the future? I hope it is, especially if we get him.
The biggest problem of Milan since Berlusconi sold the club is that Milan has not had any consistency. Each transfer window has attempted to paint on top of the last, so it is this patchwork of transfer philosophies, coach's requests, and management approaches.
If Giampaolo wasn't a genuine idiot, I would have wanted to see if he could actually implement his system. He was just so bad, he couldn't even get to the "give him time" part. Rangnick will need time, whether he gets it, I don't know, but he will need it.
If things go wrong with Ralf (if it doesn't work after two years) I think Elliott sells the club, especially assuming that the stadium begins building during that time and they let the next ownership deal with what to do next. But, I mean, Milan needs to start a new cycle of winning, and frankly, there is a base of players that can give you a spine for a good squad, do you add the right parts and more importantly: do you have the right coach to actually maximize players? I mean, the difference between Pioli and Giampaolo in terms of player performance was insane, even before Ibra came, so imagine if you have a coach who actually is talented, not just competent like Pioli?
What I hope is that Rangnick's system actually disrupts Italian tactics. I think Rangnick is more fluid with his tactics than people give him credit, which has been clear in watching games of his, and countless nerd-breakdowns of his tactical evolution, but what Rangnick understands is that organized speed, keyword here being organized, can disrupt tactics. I think Conte recognizes that in the team he has built in Inter, where the physicality of his teams really wins the day rather than any tactical inventiveness. If you watch even Giampaolo's first half against Inter, you'll see how torn up Inter was even with a horribly managed Milan side (and Suso's ridiculous miss), Conte isn't doing anything inventive, but he's shrewd. It's why Allegri was able to push the exact same Juve squad of Conte's to much higher highs.
Rangnick is as organized about his use of physicality as Conte, but, Conte's structure is used to make every game a battle of attrition that wears out the other team into making mistakes for goals, or banking on individual skill from a playmaker to give the leads. Rangnick, however, uses that physicality to create opportunities to attack, that's the difference.
Will Rangnick work? Who knows. I hope he does. I think Elliott said: "Okay, we're not going to try and destroy FFP [even though they seemed like they were going to--Man City might] so how can we maximize ourselves in this context?" That's how they got Rangnick. I think it makes sense. How Gazidis keeps his job, I don't know, he must have done better at Arsenal (financially) than I thought (which I thought was really just down to Prem TV money); maybe he's on a short leash? The point is, I get why they are choosing Rangnick, it makes a lot of sense, and it is smart. Who knows? It might be the adoption of Moneyball that helped the Red Sox win? It might be the next revolution like Sacchi, but with Rangnick as a late-blooming misunderstood genius who didn't get his break. Or... Rangnick fails.
I'm just ready for Milan to actually try something to try and fix things. We've attempted to band-aid the problems at Milan for too long. Things can always get worse of course, but at this current point, I think Giampaolo is the low-point for me, and Pioli's competence improve Milan considerably, I'm curious to see what an actual innovator like Rangnick can do with Milan. Especially since he has a passion for our club.
[Note: my last two major wall-of-text posts, I'm sorry, lol, and hopefully this can start debate on here.]
I suspect it is total BS but reading AC Milan, Consider and Jeff Hendrick in the same sentence can only evoke a strong reaction. I'm very relaxed so long as it is just a rumour and never comes to fruition.
I suspect it is total BS but reading AC Milan, Consider and Jeff Hendrick in the same sentence can only evoke a strong reaction. I'm very relaxed so long as it is just a rumour and never comes to fruition.
Btw it seems that player transfer values are really falling this year. Inter has agreed to sell Icardi for just 50 mil to PSG. Corona has devastated clubs and as well as the businesses of club owners. Another month and these small Dutch / French / Belgian clubs will be begging clubs like Milan to buy their players!
Its 57 million and they got 5 million so overall 62 million for the whole operation. Keep in mind Icardi's value drops given his agent is Wara and the guy effectively went on a hiatus and pretended to be injured for a few months season before this one.
I do agree with you though - prices will go down.
Part of me would love this move just to have an Irish player in the squad.
We've definitely acquired worse players in recent years.
TMW - Milan, Brian Rodriguez idea: contact with the agent
Time for surveys and evaluations at AC Milan. Los Angeles striker Brian Rodriguez is in the sights. First exploratory contacts with agent Pablo Bentancur, who moves to probe the market. Brian Rodriguez will land in Europe in the next market session. Napoli likes it, Sampdoria takes care of it and Bologna appreciates it. And now Milan are also in the running.
Great read.This is exactly what I thought. I was actually disappointed at KPMG's process of evaluation, I'm going to give shit to my friend who works there.
The artificial financial constraints of FFP being factored in, and also being stupid enough to use the superficial "losses" of Milan--which are large because of accounting decisions--rather than actual losses (y'know revenues minus expenses); as I've said (and Milan have reported) their actual losses are in the 22-50ish range a year... which is literally in the same range as Inter and Juve.
Barca is carrying a massive amount of debt, like... massive. That should be weighted much heavier, especially as Milan carry no debt. Elliott were the debt-holders, and... that was because they loaned Li the money... So what the fuck are they talking about?
There are things to be alarmed about with Milan, but that is on the sporting side of things. Financially, however, I have a lot of confidence in Elliott as far as financials go. Whether they make the right choices with Rangnick, Gazidis, sure, that's something worth discussing, but like you said @Nevermore, Barca players weren't cutting their wages for some PR stint, Tottenham weren't slashes wages to playing staff (20 percent) and furloughing non-playing staff because they wanted to be solidarity with people. They fucking had to do it, because they are dependent on their revenue to survive.
Milan do not need their revenue to stay afloat. Why? Because they are part of a larger financial institution that has a ton of money.
For example: Amazon's retail business loses billions, but Amazon makes profit in its web services that subsidizes its retail business--because they are trying to take over retail market rather than make money--the point is: there are good reasons you don't need to make money from a company. The fact that FFP places in emphasis on that, without the NFL and NBA-style revenue sharing and goal of competitiveness (a draft, salary cap, etc), means that they sought out a goal in a really stupid way.
All of that is to say: the fact that KPMG are making their models of valuation in accepting the stupid "logic" of FFP with the superficial fan-level analysis of a club like Milan, while ignoring the debts of other clubs (or thinking Milan still has debt), I just... I can't handle the stupidity from them. I doubt (or hope for their clients' sake) that they would use this same method in valuing other companies.
then I question why you like the team if you don't give a crap how they get to the top? why not support man city, or juve, or barca, etc. they win way more? what makes you identify with milan besides red and black stripes?
At this point i'll believe it when i see it.
Sad but true.100%. Modern Milan always guarantees flatter to deceive.
You know you got a good striker on your hands when every time he scores it makes the headlines.Andre Silva just scored a penalty after having won it himself.
how many goals messi or cr scored this weekend??
what we need (assuming we'll play with 4-3-3):
- CB x1
- RB x1
- CM x2
- LW x1* (unless you guys ok with Leao)
- RW x1
- CF x1
our budget = 100M ? (not sure)
good luck
LolAt this point i'll believe it when i see it.
When Serie A resumes on June 20, the idea is to have a game on every single day at seven different kick-off times.