Thats baffling really, altough I see most of the guys who screamed robbery directly after the fight now say it was close for GGG or a draw so thats that. How can you score it close like 115-113 and call it a robbery. Man a robbery? I can tolerate scoring it a draw or very close for GGG but thats no way a robbery.
Do you score just on punches thrown and jabs thrown? Because thats literally the only way you could score it for GGG.
Would you really argue that:
1) altough Canelo was throwing less overall he was way more effective
2) Canelo did control the ring for almost the whole fight
3) Canelo did land more Power Punches
4) Canelo had better defense altough that I would say thats close
5) Canelo did go to the body a lot where as GGG was headhunting
6) Canelo overall did more damage to GGG then vice versa, imo was obvious after the fight, GGG's face was all swollen up not even considering all the body punches he ate. He never looked like this after any fight.
props for Canelo to manage to not get backed against the rope for many rounds, but it did eventually happen - a testament to GGG's pressure.
How can you say that Canelo did more damage when he was the one that was starting to fade and stumble towards the end?
Yeah it did happen for maybe like a minute and GGG couldnt take advantage of that and yeah he had Canelo being rocked a bit like 2 times but he couldnt follow up, he ate counter punches after that.
Triple G did came back strong in the later rounds but it was to late and its not like he steamrolled Canelo. There is for example no way that GGG won the 12th round in my eyes.
Anyway, its higly subjectiv afterall and everybody scores differently and I can tolerate most scorecards, but no way a robbery.
Gonna rewatch the fight later maybe I missed some.