My vision for this forum has always been that there should be a diversity of ideas. There are many that would try to silence dissenting voices and I have no issues naming them. One of the worst was Senatore for example who actually was a very good friend of mine until he tried to convince me to help him get Wild banned.
I despise this sort of pettiness and insistence on one's viewpoint being elevated over another's... to the point where it is accepted as wisdom and to oppose is folly. When I got permabanned it was because of my constant ranting on what a fucking fraud P!rlo was while sleep walking through our games. But the powers that be hated me for this. They even convinced the mods that I was some sort of problem. I was actually banned for "trolling". Sure I said the same thing a lot but it was FUCKING TRUE. P!rlo later confirmed this all in his own book.
The point is, not because an idea is radically different to your own means that you should attempt to silence it. You never know if someone actually sees something that you don't. This is also why, in general I'm against 99.99% of bannings. The truly evil ppl and the wastes of oxygen won't be able to help themselves and would eventually reveal themselves for who they are, making the mod's jobs easy in that case.
However, to assume intent is anit-free speech and limits the quality of the forum. So, in general, I'd never ask for someone's ban no matter how much I disagree or dislike that one, and I'd hope that others try to adopt, what I hope is a large minded approach.