Did I say those guys are unbiased?
If anything, you are worse. Give me one instance when you have not defended the dude?
I mean, you are lobbying for his return based on meaningless friendlies. Choosing to completely ignore how trash he has been over the last few years and how suspect his fitness is.
Have you forgotten how injury prone he was the last time he played with us? How shit he was towards the end? Or have you forgotten our record with bringing washed up old players back or our difficulties in disposing of them later (when they predictably dont work out)
So ye, a bit rich asking others to be objective when you yourself are clearly not.
No.
If he had a bad game or bad season, I admitted it. I always say he wasn't very good in his third season here.
No. I thought he did well against Monza, but I'm mainly lobbying for his return based on that he did well here the first time, he loves the environment and I feel he could return to form and that I feel he brings a dynamism nobody else does.
He was injury prone but let's not act like he was Wilshere. He was very poor in the first half of the 3rd season. He improved when the team did and had a decent 2nd half of the season.
I agree with that point, however, I think this could be different. We had no issues getting rid of him for the first time and I feel he could do well here.
I feel me saying he was "very good, good and then bad to decent" is far more 'objective' than someone saying he was "decent, to bad to awful".