Casualista
Monsieur
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2010
- Messages
- 19,541
- Reaction score
- 7,672
Did whoscored give him man of the match again??
You guys even watch the game?? That was a very very harsh second yellow. It’s questionable that it was even a foul tbh
Why didn’t they use VAR?
That was a clear dive. Wtff
Just like Romagnoli.People do watch the games, they just have a very low understanding of the game.
People do watch the games, they just have a very low understanding of the game.
Yes, I would appreciate him understanding the game better.Just like Romagnoli.
"Thankfully" we will play the next two matches without Ale.
So, we will see how our defense holds up without him.
I like Romagnoli and I really want him to live up to the potential he once had, but you guys are ridiculously delusional.
Delusional in what exactly?
He has been our best defender this season despite today's red.
Nothing more nothing less.
If half of the season wasn't enough to figure out we can't play a 3 men defense, maybe today's match will convince Gattuso.
Can't believe the shit he's getting. He was completely screwed over by a shitty refereeing decision. Was never a red, he never touched his man. The first yellow was harsh too. Thought he had a good game.
Delusional because I really don't think his absence would matter much in our performance until he gets back to consistency in defending.
That's true. He's not the worst or the best of our defenders. For me, Zapata should play ahead of Musacchio. Our best setup has been Romagnoli-Bonucci-Zapata which looked solid in the last few Montella matches.
> wrongful red card
> "own club" fans start talking about mistake
We should not play 3 man defense and we should not play romagnoli.
Nothing complex here. Just like mexes if he isn't scoring, he is a liability. A nice, slow moving car crash.
This is just nonsensical really. 3-men defense suits our players well and Romagnoli is certainly the best pick for the left sided position. Your view is as extreme as the delusional fanboy view.
3-men defense suits our players well
Alright, I am convinced.
Clearly, I have come to the wrong conclusion from Milan's 8th position and loss/tactical failure in every big game that we are in a system that's well suited for us.
A system which literally just 3 of our players (not even the coach) are familiar with before Milan (Bonucci, Conti, Kessie. RR at Wolfsburg but he failed).
All other players have achieved their modicum of success in 4-man variants. Success they are clearly unable to replicate in 3 man systems.
Milan shares absolutely no characteristic familiar with successful (semi-successful) 3 man systems like Chelsea or Juve - strong, fast, physical wing backs and wingers, proper regista and holding midfielders, competent target man.
I mean, we did change our "well" suited system 21 times in 21 games and the only position we settled on was Borini should be right wing back.
But I am now convinced otherwise.
Gattuso played 3-4-3 with the teams he coached. Biglia has experience with 3 at the back too.
I would´t mind going back to 4-3-3 as I always liked that system. It´s funny how the majority of the forum hated on it and wished for 3 at the back. Now going back to 4 at the back will not solve our problems like 3 at the back did not when everybody cried for it.