You're becoming a bit laughable here too. We've discussed the limitations of the human eye + brain regarding processing incoming information quick enough + most of all flawlessly at length here in related threads (technology - yes or no etc). NOBODY is able to make correct calls all the time, irrespective of the level of officiating, you won't see it in your domestic league, nor in Serie A, nor EPL, nor in the First Alien league on the moon... or elsewhere
I've seen a much more valid goal tonight disallowed after an erroneous offside call (Schalke-Werder, German Cup match), by an otherwise flawless ref team. This shit happens + if you want the element of doubt out of the game then please raise your voice against Maldini, Ancelotti etc etc + support video technology in football.
Ahm + why should I trust your video editing ? You're trying to prove your point, right ? FYI, the dark + light colored areas of the lawn aren't 100% parallel + of identical width + don't prove anything, let alone an offside position. So why should I admit I'm wrong ? Apparently I've seen what the linesman saw, or at least I can relate as to why he made the call. Why is it so hard to admit it was a call that could have gone either way ? I bet in a reversed case with Milan being the beneficiary you would never insist on the opponent being robbed but make a ton of excuses for the poor linesman who just made a tiny mistake.
Milan should have won this match with or without that disallowed goal. Milan again failed to deliver against a relegation contender. That's the true shame, not the ruling you've been whinging over.
So... again: If Sheva (+ the team) had delivered, Milan would have won.
But the ref + linesmen have to have radar eyesight. Brilliant.