Ibra was a flop in that he didn't become a part of the team, which is completely Ibra's fault, he refused to become part of the system and play the way Barca want to play.
So it was his fault he was moved to winger after Messi's tantrum?
Ibra was a flop in that he didn't become a part of the team, which is completely Ibra's fault, he refused to become part of the system and play the way Barca want to play.
Ibra was a flop in that he didn't become a part of the team, which is completely Ibra's fault, he refused to become part of the system and play the way Barca want to play.
46 games 22 goals and 13 assists isn't a flop.He is a stubborn ass at times and that contributed hugely to them selling him on.But he wasn't a flop in a footballing sense.
Mendieta , Gerrard Lopez , our own Oliveira they are flops.
But as much of an ass as Ibra was , In 46 games he scored or created 35 goals.I'd be hell of happy if a player in our squad had 22 goals and 13 assists next May.
you don't run a ferrari like a fiat
given Ibra's speed he's more of a Fiat Panda than a Ferrari.
who cares about pace?
The 'you don't run a ferrari like a fiat' analogy runs both ways, Barca are the Ferrari, and Ibra is the Fiat. You don't change a working system to fit 1 player.
actually what he meant is that pep wasn't using him to his best, which is how he was using him in the first half of the season until messi requested to get his position changed.
it has nothing to do with pace or team quality...it's about using ibra to his best, when he has his freedom, very few players are better.
Ibra was not a Flop at Barcelona. They won the league, and he scored 16 Goals, 7 Assists in 29 Games in La Liga. Then, he scored 4 and Assisted 2 in 10 UCL games. That's not a flop. The issue was personalities, and Messi's desire to play in the middle that fucked up everything at Barca for Ibra.
The problem, however, was that they paid too much for him. 40M plus Eto'o or whatever the hell it was ..was simply ridiculous.
Chygrinskiy was 25M from Shakhtar, and then after he flopped was sold back to them for 15M.
Pep bought D. Villa, Alexis Sanchez, Cesc Fabregas, Seydou Keita, Adriano, Dani Alves, Mascherano, Pique.
He got rid of non-hard-working players such as Ronaldinho and Deco.
His bad buys were Chygrinskiy and to some extent Ibrahimovic, considering Barcelona paid €43.5M + Eto'o, a value way out of whack. While Ibra had a really good season with Barcelona, he didn't fit the system, and Pep did not realize this, therefore making it a poor buy. Another buy that did not work was Ibrahim Affelay, but he can't really be counted as I think Barca paid like 3-5M Euros for him.
Pep had many Barcelona youth players such as Puyol, Pedro, Iniesta, Xavi, Messi, Busquets, and he integrated new youth players very nicely, including Tello, Alcantara, Cuenca.
From what I've read he had a lot of control of his squad choosing, but let's be honest, he had a really good youth system there, and he had a lot of money to spend as well.
Lastly, it should be noted that Barcelona have 25 Players. Not 33 like we do.
Something people need to realise is that we have a huge squad because we have injury crises almost every season.
If we had that mythical '25 player squad', we'd be fucked if we had an injury crisis similar to those we've had for the last 3/4 years and running.
It's great to have a smaller squad and less wages because of it, but it isn't good to have a squad of 25 when we come across a period where we have like 12 players out atleast every season.
Pep showed interest in bringing Pato to Bartha, and was full of praise for him after his game against Barca.
Conclusion is we`d have to change most of the squad to fit Pep, and that`s not happening.He said he was fast, the very next press conference he was asked about Pato's goal again and he was very dismissive of him, saying he did nothing during the game but the goal.
I agree with Senatore, Pato is not what Pepe would want.
He is ill fitted to Pep's tactics. Pato can't play tici-taca, to fit Pato into the team he would have to drastically change his tactics in a way that is completely contradictory to his style.
Besides that, if you have seen Pep berating Sanchez on the sidelines for getting injured you'd understand Pato would crumble under his leadership.
Bojan wouldn't stay if Pep came either, for their difficult relationship.
Boateng would be too anarcic a player and too direct as well, I don't think he'd keep him.
He said he was fast, the very next press conference he was asked about Pato's goal again and he was very dismissive of him, saying he did nothing during the game but the goal.
I agree with Senatore, Pato is not what Pepe would want.
He is ill fitted to Pep's tactics. Pato can't play tici-taca, to fit Pato into the team he would have to drastically change his tactics in a way that is completely contradictory to his style.
Besides that, if you have seen Pep berating Sanchez on the sidelines for getting injured you'd understand Pato would crumble under his leadership.
Bojan wouldn't stay if Pep came either, for their difficult relationship.
Boateng would be too anarcic a player and too direct as well, I don't think he'd keep him.
Saying he was very dismissive is a bit harsh.
That's what Pep exactly said in the very next press conference before they played Osasuna when asked about Pato:
“Pato? An excellent player in a great team, he proved with the goal, but after that he didn’t do much..."
random question:
who would you prefer?
Pep with 80 millions on transfer budget but start from scratch (selling mediocre's MF and buying decent players)
or
Allegri improving our curently squad weakness and buying good LB, CB, CF, MF's?
I read a transcript that had a very different tone, but then again as we see from the many different recaps of Milan's press conferences a statement can come off in many different ways, video is the best medium for these things.
Saying he was very dismissive is a bit harsh.
That's what Pep exactly said in the very next press conference before they played Osasuna when asked about Pato:
“Pato? An excellent player in a great team, he proved with the goal, but after that he didn’t do much..."
Now, how's that very dismissive?
He scored his goal after 20 seconds, and he said that after the goal he didn't do much.
Pretty smooth dick slap.
He scored his goal after 20 seconds, and he said that after the goal he didn't do much.
Pretty smooth dick slap.