Would you say the same thing if Gattuso had instead started cutrone and silva in a 4-4-2 leaving out kalinic and Aceventura and we still drew this game? Torino scored due to a defensive error from a set piece. And last I checked, we were missing Romagnoli, who's been a wall in defending our set pieces for us.
No I wouldn't have said that....but then again...I'm not sure that we'd be in the predicament we got ourselves in if we were constantly bombarding Torino.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Gattuso had two options 1) Start Kalinic 2) Not start Kalinic
-He chose to start the shit one.
-The shit one didn't score (shocker I know
)
-Torino scored...i.e. we now needed a goal
-He takes off the admittedly shit Suso and brings on Silva and Cutrone
-Now we have two strikers on but less supply....even though said supply was playing like shit. Who better to trust to cross in the ball for Silva and Cutrone than Suso. Didn't Silva's last goal come off a Suso cross? Honestly, the grinta tactics need to yield to a little bit of strategy every now and then!
-Are you still NOT seeing the problem with this sequence?
I know you really mean to say "No one has improved since Gattuso came to Milan except Borini"
But even with that correction, this is the dumbest thing I've read in recent times. If you skill of observation is as bad as your writing, then that explains your garbage point of view.
ciao.
Agreed. Nobody can deny that Gattuso has fixed the defense and the midfield to a large extent.
Bonucci looked semi-pro before he came....our defense is pretty solid. I'll give him credit for that.