Madridista
not exactly a lightweight
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Messages
- 8,020
- Reaction score
- 4
- Fav. Players
- Doku, Osimhen, Rafael Leao, Tonali, Rodrygo, Valverde, De Paul, Lautaro Martinez, Pogba, Fekir
Its because of arguments like the Shevchenko one that you 'lost the battle'. Actually, that is not an argument at all, it is hypothetical and doesn't make any breakthrough, you could imagine anything like that and say it. There is nothing close to evidence for that. What if Ronaldo never got injured? That is less impossible than your Brazilian Sheva prospect. Would he then be considered better than Van Basten by you?madtherchot said:Amusingly, I am continuously misinformed that I have lost some battle of sorts. Far as I can tell, I haven't discussed either players' qualities in detail, since even when briefly mentioning their attributes, I've been told that my observations are incorrect. And unlike Ronaldo, MVB's qualities haven't been thoroughly mentioned in this thread ... I mean, there have even been claims that Ronaldo possesses qualities that haven't been seen on the pitch! I would have taken the liberty to mention MVB's characteristics and moments of brilliance, but besides being enormous and hence time consuming, I don't see the need if people don't agree with my summary of what type of player he was. Its clear that this thread has developed into a clash of egos ... people who fancy Ronaldo versus those who don't.
That said, I was responding to claims made by Clayton and Wild ... that MVB wasn't the more deadlier; and that Ronaldo was the more complete striker, respectively. So I didn't bring in 'irrelevant' points, but was merely responding. Once again, you've got your panties tied in a bunch. Regardless, I think MVB's pace, touch, control, finishing, passing, visions, and hence, overall team-play (creating chances), was far more superior than an average striker ... whereas Ronaldo's aerial abilities weren't. I have already conceded that Ronaldo was quicker, perhaps a better dribbler ... but the latter isn't certain since they had different types of play, and so had different mindsets. I think its safe to say that as far as touch and control go, on either foot, MVB was up there with the best. I just think that MVB's style created more for the team ... but when a touch of individual brilliance was needed, he delivered as well.
Of course Sheva was a more complete striker than Ronaldo (but not MVB). Which is why I suggested that had he been Brazilian, he'd probably have scored more goals in the WC. But of course, people fail to reason since the suggestion doesn't bode well for the Ronaldo-cause. Something I have no interested whatsoever in entertaining, and probably is why I'm so popular in this thread, and others.
Perhaps because I'm stating an entirely valid opinion ... an opinion based on facts rather than hatred, as falsely suggested. An opinion which is justifiable especially considering the environment in which it has been developed – a Milan forum, a club at which Ronaldo has undeniably been the utter definition of a flop; an embarrassment both to himself and the club; a mistake that some of us foresaw even before his arrival, warned about, got savagely ridiculed in the process, and are still being dragged into the mess that is Ronaldo's downfall, simply because you lot can't accept the fact that he's rubbish nowadays. So no, what you are witnessing isn't hatred. Rather, a retaliation to the insults consistently slung our way, for not agreeing that Ronaldo is the greatest and whatnot – the bulk of the instigators only making themselves known after his unfortunate arrival. People who've been around long enough will be able to testify to this. They still persist, albeit more subdued, with their agenda-driven negative observations of current or past Milan players, coaches, management and, of course, the Milan Lab saga ... dragging and introducing Ronaldo fables that are almost a decade old and have no significance to what the main subject at hand is – Milan, and definitely not Ronaldo, and this thread is no exception.
PS. Guess I did have some time to spare. You're welcome.
As for the second part of the post, I think I've heard enough whining from you about the whole issue. Nobody ganged up on you when speculations about Ronaldo coming started and when you said it is probably not going to work out. Actually, the majority thought so, as Ronaldo was on a decline with his age and injuries. It was a gamble, but it was not Ronaldo who is to blame for that, but your beloved G&B who bought him. So your hate is misguided.
Another thing altogether is your desperate cry for attention after his injury when instead of showing solidarity and support like any normal football follower you celebrated about how you were right back then, obviously frustrated that the previous half season Ronaldo denied your accusations that he is garbage by playing some pretty decent football. If that is not hate, I don't know what is. Stop dragging your frustrations from his arrival and first season here, as you outnumbered the supporters then by a lot may I say. Now it seems it isn't so as despite the obvious doubts many people had before he came, they are not happy, but are recognizing what he did. Can't help but feel for your defeat, as you are one of the very few left who can actually say Ronaldo was 'a flop' for Milan.