1. You did not read my post carefully, I said "
above average fighter in Pride". I assume since you've never watched Fedor, you don't know about "p4p greatest"-Anderson's time in Pride. He beat Stiebling and Newton, who are solid journeymen at best, and Diet Butcher Otsuka who is a pro wrestler and a certified can. He lost to Daijyu Takase and Ryo Chonan, another two journey man in Japan (freak win or not, Chonan pulls off arguably one of the sweetest subs on Anderson). What's wrong with saying he was "above average" in Pride?
2. You've never watched Fedor, so you don't know what P4P best looks like, so I can't really argue with you. To give you a better idea, Fedor negated Nogueira (in his prime)'s grappling and GnP the shit out of him. He survived Cro Cop (in his prime)'s left high kick, had his nose broken by a jab, and also was visibly discolored in his body from the kicks, still he was able to outstrike Cro Cop and take him down repeatedly and followed up with vicious GnP. He armbarred the "Godfather of GnP" Mark Coleman eventhough Coleman dictated where the fight went. He fights back from being viciously slammed by Randleman (before he fell off) and still win the fight. His only lost at that time period came from TK, and it was stopped due to a cut. Sure, Fedor isn't as good now and he kind of went down with Pride, but during his Pride years, Fedor was FOR SURE, the best.
3. Sure every champ has their style, but Anderson's style is not really an imposing one. He clowns around in order to get lesser strikers to engage with him and KO's them. Did you see his fight with Damian Maia and Thales Leites? When those guys are smart and doesn't bite to his gameplan? Or when Maia knocked him down chasing him around when he clowns around. Only "worthy" challengers for his belt were Weidman, Henderson, and Belfort. Rest of the guys all have GLARING holes in their game. To prove he is well-rounded? He subbed Sonnen, whoopity-fucking-doo-da, Sonnen can't defend subs, that's nothing new. And some of his fights against Irvin, Bonnar, and Griffin, did anyone think those guys are going to win?
I believe Anderson isn't as well-rounded as some of the other champs, and when people don't bite to his "clowning" he really hasn't shown a plan B. To use your own argument, I believe Anderson's never had a real challenger in the MW, and all his LHW fights were against guys who were willing to play into his gameplan. Who were his "rival"? Sonnen? Rich Franklin? It's not that he is dominating rather the division is weak. This isn't his fault but it affects his legacy
in my opinion.
Now, to clarify. I did not call him "above-average" I said "he was above-average with PRIDE". I think he is a great fighter, but there is no way he is as dominating as Fedor was during his Pride run. Also, he hardly fought anyone well-rounded in a VERY weak middleweight division. Many people buy into the UFC hype machine, my statement was that when Dana White said Anderson was P4P better than Fedor, it was outrageous. And my original statement was only to agree with MilanMB's sentiment.
PS - you need to watch Fedor fights as well as other PRIDE fights to learn about the history of the sport before criticizing others.