Ac Ultima 13
Gold Tie
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 157
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- South Africa
- Fav. Players
- Nesta, Pato, Robson, TSilly, Ibra
I think i read somewhere that he has a pre-contract with us
I think i read somewhere that he has a pre-contract with us
borrielo,pato,jkh,paloschi/pippo is all we need, 30 mil. for dzeko can be spend on others
for pippo there's paloschi , jkh .. let atleast wait till end of season to evaluate him, he's improving , don't think berlu will spend 30 mil. for dzeko ,just sayn'..
i heard wolfs wants cash only, dunno , a lot can happen till next summer, imo we should go for krasic , all our strikers are scoring now
Really, do we need Dzeko? I really don't see him as that much of an improvement over Huntelaar/Boriello. He is talented, but he's not exactly the next Shevchenko.
We don't need strikers - as it is Pato is perhaps the best forward in Italy, and Bori/Hunt/Pippo are solid. I'm sure that Huntelaar will pick up form sooner or later.
So, yes, we don't need Dzeko. We need fullbacks. And Pirlo cover.
He is an improvement over Huntelaar, and Borriello is made out of glass.
And that is worth 25m euros?
And that is worth 25m euros?
I'd rather we bid for fullbacks. Our attack is solid, and our youngest. Since Berlu won't spend, Dzeko is an excess we can't allow.
Though I might just be scared of another Gilardino happening to us. Dzeko is more complete striker than Huntelaar, but so is Ricardo Oliveira, and I don't see you asking for his return.
I agree with Anilak. I don't think we should buy Dzeko. If we were gonna play 4-3-1-2, then I'd say we should. but not in our current formation.
Pato in my opinion, had his best period playing as the lone striker in a 4-3-2-1, that's the formation we played around January and some time forward last year. He average'd almost a goal a game during that period, and tons of assists. I don't see why he wouldn't be able to work in a similar way in our current formation.
The reason I say that, is that if we have 20-25 M euro's to spent on an attacker, then I think we'd be better off, buying a RW, instead of a CF, to get the most out of Pato. It seems to me like he really isn't optimal at the right. We saw again against Sampdoria, that once he was moved to the left he created way more.
I'm pretty sure Dzeko is a pretty special player, and it does suck to miss out on him, but he's not the only player on the market, and I'm sure that a player like Krasic could do pretty good things for Milan as well.
I was against Ricardo Oliveira all the time. IMO bullshit to compare them to make a point. They are so not the same.
We should ALSO buy a fullback. (edit: a leftback, Clichy will do) edit2, but we need a decent CB even more, also a creative midfielder, also a winger
I like Dzeko, but the reason I want a winger is cos I want Pato to play his natural spot and want him to be happy. I see Pato as the face of our club for a long time like how Sheva and Kaka were. Not worried about Borri's injuries as I expect him to be a sub for Pato at CF. If Dzeko comes instead of a winger it means Pato stays at RW . I don't want the formation change. Even though Dzeko is good and is our fan, there r a lot of good players who r our fans also - Balotelli, Santon, Rannochia, Bochetti, Fabrigas, Krasic - even Drogba said he was our fan wen growing up. Can't have all the players in the world who are our fans in our squad anyway.
Dinho Pato Winger with Borri Hunter Pippo Adiyiah as subs is good enough. We can use the additional 10-15 million needed to buy Dzeko to get a CB , midfileder or fullback which would make our squad overall better.