The Rumour Commode XXIX: The real Maldoban era.

Which nickname do you think fits best for the Maldini and Boban duo?

  • Total voters
    134
Status
Not open for further replies.
Curupira

Curupira

Milan Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
38,567
Reaction score
65,123
Didn't someone say Zaracho is an Argentinean Lucas Paqueta
 
M

milanator

Milan Legend
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
7,461
Reaction score
4,411
Location
Austria
I‘d would keep my eyes on De Paul too, with the current set up he would work well because he is a feisty and grinta kind of player too.
 
Last edited:
Ronin

Ronin

Milansochist
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
13,041
Reaction score
2,480
Fav. Players
Maldini, Nesta, Gattuso, Rui Costa, Albertini, Serginho, Seedorf, Redondo, Ibrahimovic, Ronaldinho
Watching Napoli defend was 3 times more interesting than this Real-City snooze fest
 
KujaIX

KujaIX

Mexes & Muntari fanboy
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
35,575
Reaction score
4,196
Fav. Players
Current team
omer486 said:
Guardiola often switches to negative tactics in important CL games in the knockout stages.
Click to expand...

Let's not pretend his team are being purposefully shit.

Napoli defended well and countered. City are turgid. Madrid are just as shit.

Frankly, Napoli and Bayern have been the only teams this week to not look shit (haven't seen Lyon but it's not hard to look good vs Sorri)
 
M

MilanBG

Milan Legend
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
8,683
Reaction score
15,448
The Bitch plays like crap... Too bad we will miss so many starters in the Coppa game
 
R

rossonero1

Milan Legend
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
30,361
Reaction score
13,656
MilanBG said:
The Bitch plays like crap... Too bad we will miss so many starters in the Coppa game
Click to expand...

Juve’s run is almost over. They’re all old. Just like how Napoli will look much different next season. Hopefully this is the summer Milan take that next step. The opportunity will be there.
 
Last edited:
Batman

Batman

Team Doctor
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
1,817
Reaction score
400
Fav. Players
Nesta, Inzaghi, Gattuso, Kaka, T. Silva, Romagnoli, Maldini
Colossus said:
The player that I’d most like to play the AM role in our 4231 is Lorenzo Pellegrini. He has improved so much in the last couple of seasons and he’s one of the most creative players around.

He can score and assist, is two footed and hard working with experience of playing as a mezz’ala and even in a double pivot. He fits the profile of the type of player that I think we should go for in that he can play both AM and mezz’ala giving us versatility, workrate and quality to boot.

I’ve read that he’s having trouble with Roma in contract talks so maybe we should keep an eye on his situation.
Click to expand...

I agree with us. He'd be a great upgrade to hakan
 
mrki

mrki

Milan Legend
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
15,974
Reaction score
15,568
Location
passive offside
Fav. Players
maldini, pippo, boban
La champions league tu non la vinci mai...lalala... ladri
 
Il grande Milan

Il grande Milan

Honey, I'm home
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
4,791
Reaction score
2,703
Location
A little place called Aassspen
KujaIX said:
Let's not pretend his team are being purposefully shit.

Napoli defended well and countered. City are turgid. Madrid are just as shit.

Frankly, Napoli and Bayern have been the only teams this week to not look shit (haven't seen Lyon but it's not hard to look good vs Sorri)
Click to expand...

How can you say that, Napoli was so embarrassing to watch.
 
Qaas

Qaas

Vi må tage det som det kommer
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
38,859
Reaction score
69,886
Location
Danmark
Fav. Players
KAKA, Maldini, Nesta, Dida, Inzaghi, Sheva, TSilva, R9, Raul, Casillas, Schmeichel, Messi, Zlatan
Goodfella

Goodfella

Milan Legend
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
14,798
Reaction score
1,478
fray said:
There wasn't any capital loss on Piatek. In fact, we recorded a very small capital gain.

Hertha Berlin paid €27m + bonuses (per Di Marzio who initially broke the Piatek - Hertha story).

Piatek's book value at the time we sold him was approx. €27m, hence why the Milan mgmt were reluctant to sell/loan him for a figure lower than the aforementioned number.
Click to expand...

IL Diavolo 3 said:
No capital loss on Piatek. You have to calculate the ammorization.
Click to expand...


23m+bonus according to Kicker and Bild, who claimed that Italian papers had got it wrong. They have great insight into dealings of Bundesfodder clubs. Di Marzio on the other hand is no longer a mouthpiece and scout/advisor for the Milan CEO(Galliani). No different to the other transfer gurus. He has already got the details of one Milan-Bundesfodder deal wrong this season(Rebic's).


23m, 27m, it's still a capital loss since it's less than the original purchase price.
That's the actual definition of it. I know that the commode is using CalcioMercato re-definition of plusvalenza, which is why I added "end of". That definition might be appropriate for certain matters, but not overall.
You don't get a clean slate once the year is over. There are and will be more (negative) consequences to the 146m loss last year.
 
IL Diavolo 3

IL Diavolo 3

Fester
New Era Vanguard
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
28,424
Reaction score
13,690
Goodfella said:
23m+bonus according to Kicker and Bild, who claimed that Italian papers had got it wrong. They have great insight into dealings of Bundesfodder clubs. Di Marzio on the other hand is no longer a mouthpiece and scout/advisor for the Milan CEO(Galliani). No different to the other transfer gurus. He has already got the details of one Milan-Bundesfodder deal wrong this season(Rebic's).


23m, 27m, it's still a capital loss since it's less than the original purchase price.
That's the actual definition of it. I know that the commode is using CalcioMercato re-definition of plusvalenza, which is why I added "end of". That definition might be appropriate for certain matters, but not overall.
You don't get a clean slate once the year is over. There are and will be more (negative) consequences to the 146m loss last year.
Click to expand...
Do you know what is ammorization?
 
Goodfella

Goodfella

Milan Legend
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
14,798
Reaction score
1,478
IL Diavolo 3 said:
Do you know what is ammorization?
Click to expand...

Yes, assuming you meant amortization . It's what the likes of CalcioMercato base their re-definition of plusvalenza on.

Is it supposed to refute my point?
 
Last edited:
Casualista

Casualista

Monsieur
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
19,541
Reaction score
7,672
Qaas said:
Aubameyang still trash
Click to expand...



tenor.gif
 
Alo88

Alo88

Milan Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2013
Messages
16,917
Reaction score
29,570
Location
Switzerland
IL Diavolo 3 said:
Do you know what is ammorization?
Click to expand...
Even if there would be plusvalenza in the current fiscal year because you sold the player above his current book value (purchase price minus the yearly amortizations), the amortization still impacts your profit (amortization / player value X).

Meaning: You can still have a capital loss in your books of the current year if the value you sold the player for is under the value of the amortization of the same year. However you loose money either way if you sell him under the price you originally bought him if you don't take only the current year into consideration but all the years since you bought him. If you want your cash flow to rise over the course of the years there is no way around selling players over the price you originally bought them.
 
Tobinho

Tobinho

Decisive Hours
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
6,178
Reaction score
693
Location
Dubai
Goodfella said:
23m, 27m, it's still a capital loss since it's less than the original purchase price.
That's the actual definition of it. I know that the commode is using CalcioMercato re-definition of plusvalenza, which is why I added "end of". That definition might be appropriate for certain matters, but not overall.
Click to expand...

That's the definition of capital loss in a business sense when amortization is not calculated but football clubs do use that method. In fact they will calculate a profit improvement which also includes the salary that would have been paid to the player in the year after his sale to record a profit.

Piatek was signed on a 4.5 year contract for 35m, so the 'value on the books' which is the amount of the transfer fee that would be amortized over the remainder of his contract was 27.7m. We were paying him something like 3.4-3.6m gross, let's call it 3.5m.

Then the effect on the clubs books with the sale to Hertha Berlin would be 27.7m - the fee Berlin paid - 3.5m. So a sale price of 24.2 would have been break even as far as Milan's profits go. A sale price of 23 would have resulted in a loss, a sale price of 27m would have resulted in a profit improvement.

This video should make it clear:

https://youtu.be/wHgRiDvPzNY
 
M

MilanBG

Milan Legend
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
8,683
Reaction score
15,448
Maurizio Sarri: "In Italy, we would've had 2 penalties in our favour."

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Savo

Savo

Mike Danton.. Deadly Prey
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
4,275
Reaction score
10
Fav. Players
Kaka, Maldini, Nesta, Gattuso, Pirlo, Inzaghi, Ambrosini, Sheva, Seedorf, Silva, Totti
pellegrini would fit the mold here. he's a hard worker but also creative and versatile. if he wants to come i'd like to see him here
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Schedule
Top