Soldier_of_god
Milan Legend
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 28,442
- Reaction score
- 7,867
- Location
- brisbane
- Fav. Players
- cr7, Kaka, sheva, zidane, pastore , zlatan ibra,T.silva, jovetic, Arjen robben, drogba, suarez
cmon wawzaaaaa
vamos rafa u bloody beauty. decimate federer's record please. u r the greatest player ever along with federer. u only have to equal his record to be considered the greatest of all time. Actually i think 16 is enough cause he has 28 masters to fedex's 21 haha. Vamos king, love u man. An absolute legend, its a shame my second favourite player wawrinka had to depart so early. he has the talent to beat rafa on clay. hopefully wawrinka turns the heat on in Wimbledon. Djoker i love u too brah, bad luck but i have a feeling he will win the US open.
vamos rafa u bloody beauty. decimate federer's record please. u r the greatest player ever along with federer. u only have to equal his record to be considered the greatest of all time. Actually i think 16 is enough cause he has 28 masters to fedex's 21 haha. Vamos king, love u man. An absolute legend, its a shame my second favourite player wawrinka had to depart so early. he has the talent to beat rafa on clay. hopefully wawrinka turns the heat on in Wimbledon. Djoker i love u too brah, bad luck but i have a feeling he will win the US open.
Even if Rafa surpasses Federer in every way possible, people will still drool over Federer. Commentators always talk about Federer in a envious way. Quite annoying tbh.
I think it's the style of play he has produced too though.
Federer could destroy a player in 3 straight sets, and it's as entertaining as watching a five set thriller.
Federer's style is definitely the most graceful and entertaining.
It's a matter which style you like, I guess. Federer is a fantastic tennis player. His forehand, backhand, its all mighty fine and all but when his opponent starts to give resistance, my view on it is that he doesnt always have an answer to that. Whereas Nadal is a real fighter that can adopt to all kinds of resistances. His top spin on a clay court in combination with letting the ball jump up high are just . The only time I really saw Nadal not having an answer was during the French Open in 2009 in the fourth round versus Soderling. From what I remember Soderling served harder than Nadal could handle. His only defeat at the French Open (He beat Soderling in 2010 though ). Beside that, I enjoy long rallies and they often go to Nadal.
Give me a 4, 4, 3, 3 over a 9, 2, 2, 1.
fuck nadal. Boring and irritating.
He's unquestioned goat of clay, but having 9 there, 2 at wimbledon and us and 1 at ao just seems so... Unequal.
Sure, he has a lot of masters and stuff, but his slam count is just so uneven.
Give me a 4, 4, 3, 3 over a 9, 2, 2, 1.
I agree with that but it's also kind of cool to be absolutely untouchable on one surface . I wouldn't mind losing the Coppa Italia and Serie A a bunch of times if it means winning the Champions league each year. Preferably all though :devilehh:.
As a massive Federer fan, i will be forever greatful to Soderling for that.
Roger went on to defeat Nadal's conqueror in that year's final.
It's a pity Soderling didn't maintain that kind of form.
Even if Rafa surpasses Federer in every way possible, people will still drool over Federer. Commentators always talk about Federer in a envious way. Quite annoying tbh.
i think its cause nadal only dominates in one surface. But he is the indisputable best at his favourite surface and that to me is the true sign of greatness. both are great but i like nadal's style of play more cause he is physical specimen. I can relate to him easily, hence why he is my favourite. No one has ever defeated him in a final at the roland gorras, he will complete the la decima next year. Vamos the true king. The only trophy missing from his cabinet is a WTF which is the second most prestigious tournament after the grand slams. Cmon rafaaaaa
he is physical specimen. I can relate to him easily
Soderling gifted Federer that remaining Grand Slam he needed like Bjorn Kuipers gave Barcelona that penalty . I wouldve loved it if Federer never won that tournament :deviliri:. Ah well, he never really beat the real champion:
Fuck Nadal. Boring and irritating.
He's unquestioned GOAT of clay, but having 9 there, 2 at Wimbledon and US and 1 at AO just seems so... unequal.
Sure, he has a lot of masters and stuff, but his slam count is just so uneven.
Give me a 4, 4, 3, 3 over a 9, 2, 2, 1.
I agree with that but it's also kind of cool to be absolutely untouchable on one surface . I wouldn't mind losing the Coppa Italia and Serie A a bunch of times if it means winning the Champions league each year. Preferably all though :devilehh:.
4, 1, 7, 5? :d