maybe because we signed Krunic already
Giampaolo started converting him into a regista, if we sell Biglia we need 2 registi anyway, so one that can also play mezz'ala would be handy.
maybe because we signed Krunic already
Yes, Maldini was reportedly the one that convinced management to stick with Gattuso until the seasons end. Giampaolo was presented to management by Maldini, the club is following Paolo's recommendation going forward.
In the end, the plan B direction of the club meant Leo was no longer required and the PSG job conveniently arrives and suits his style of working as SD.
Which midfielder would you like Milan to sign?
From what I understand, the losses that Milan have incurred are from our transfer activity, not from operating losses.
One of the cornerstones of Elliott's legal argument is that they would classify transfer expenditures as investment from their end, as the new owners, which would be necessary in any business involving essentially flipping depreciated assets.
CL would have been crucial to changing the cash flow of the club, but not the owners, and they'd argue, "if the wages of the players and staff is being paid, transfer expenditures are external costs that are supplied by the ownership, so, if the owners leave, the club will continue go pay what it owes to players and staff. FFP is an artificial control on business owners and prevents them from creating improvements."
Itd be like telling real estate investors they can't fix houses they want to resell without the money from rent. I think Elliott has a very strong case.
Which Pellegrini is he referring to here? Luca or Lorenzo?
From what I understand, the losses that Milan have incurred are from our transfer activity, not from operating losses.
One of the cornerstones of Elliott's legal argument is that they would classify transfer expenditures as investment from their end, as the new owners, which would be necessary in any business involving essentially flipping depreciated assets.
CL would have been crucial to changing the cash flow of the club, but not the owners, and they'd argue, "if the wages of the players and staff is being paid, transfer expenditures are external costs that are supplied by the ownership, so, if the owners leave, the club will continue go pay what it owes to players and staff. FFP is an artificial control on business owners and prevents them from creating improvements."
Itd be like telling real estate investors they can't fix houses they want to resell without the money from rent. I think Elliott has a very strong case.
I think Torreira is another made up rumour. Because of the Giampaolo connection and his comments about England. I don't think Arsenal will let him leave for less that 50m.Torreira I like, and de Paul
AwwI think it's better to throw money in the river rather then spending it on Veretout, Pellegrini and Sensi.
Actually, one of Sensi and Veretout will be ok but just for bench. But I highly doubt it that they will be "just" backups.
Then it's Maldini who's more at fault than Leonardo given that Gattuso as a coach has a way bigger influence on how the team performs, no? So why didn't they sack Maldini and kept Leonardo? It doesn't make sense to me.
The only logical explanation is that Leonardo planned his outgoing way before the season ended as PSG approached him way before. The job didn't just conveniently occur when Leo was sacked. There was no sack at all. It was him who decided that PSG suits his style of working (and salary) more than Elliotts Milan. So, as I see it, he accepted the job and by the end of the season he greeted all good bye.
Pellegrini for 30m isn’t bad to be honest...
Then why are you against signing him?• Jordan Veretout
2nd most chances created in Serie A for the last 2 seasons .. (After Pjanic)
Then why are you against signing him?
I wonder why the Praet rumors have died down?
Veretout is linked with us, arsenal, napoli, psg and roma...honestly I've never seen him play, but surely he's not as shit as people here make out
He looks like a 16 year old with a 40 year old face
He's not shit but not upgrade either.
What's the point of spending money on someone who will not upgrade you?