Oblak has a salary around 10m. You're telling me if he decides to move on there wouldn't be a line of clubs willing to offer him more and satisfy AM with a transfer fee worth more than 100m? The club was worried about his previous 100m release clause was too low and had to remove it.
For normal clubs, a good goalkeeper is enough. For the absolute elite level clubs, paying much more for the best GKs gives them an edge and they pay to get that. Chelsea thought they had it with Kepa, Liverpool paid around 75m for Allison, and Donnarumma should be seen as a keeper in that level. In the right circumstances (not covid, Gigio proving himself in the CL, big club needing an elite GK) we could find someone willing to pay 60m+ for him and still be able to offer him matching or better wages than what we're paying him, which shouldn't exceed 8m.
I really don't see the problem here. If we let him go for free then we lose the transfer. If he's willing to renew with a slight increase then we don't really change much within our wage structure. If he demands something crazy like 10m then he should walk. What are we arguing about here?
Oblak is on 10M and that is the reason why no one is after him, despite having ridiculous stats. AM will of course be asking for 100M+ for him.
Not even PSG would pay 10M+ in salary and 100M+ for a GK.
They would for a outfield player but not for a GK.
Alison went for 75M but his salary is "only" 5M, which is what I mentioned above as the only possible scenario for a GK to be sold for a high transfer fee.
Again, the only way Milan can make any money off a sale, is if Dollar was on a low wage, but that ship sailed a long, long, time ago.
We aren't ever going to be making any money out of him and we're not an elite club with 800M+ revenue, so he is a luxury we can't afford.
Not to mention the Pandora's box effect mentioned earlier.