mumbojumbo
Special Guy
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2004
- Messages
- 2,634
- Reaction score
- 586
Tomorrow. We better not underestimate. We threw away great opportunities in the past.
When the rumors about Rangnick we’re gaining steam we weren’t doing that well at the time. Pioli wasn’t supposed to be a long term option, he was just there to steady the ship. The 5:0 happened with Pioli in charge. Gazidis changed his mind after our lockdown form, which was a big decision at the time. Many of us were shocked when the news that Pioli was staying broke during halftime. At the time it was almost certain that even though the team was playing great, it was still going to be Rangnick. It wasn’t an easy decision, which is why it’s really unfair and weird to blame Gazidis for almost making a blunder. It’s much more reasonable to actually praise him for not being stubborn and changing his mind when the evidence clearly showed Pioli was the man we needed.Rangnick is doing meh with a lot of draws.... gazidis... oh gazidis.... you almost made a blunder
Game is in 6 hours.Tomorrow. We better not underestimate. We threw away great opportunities in the past.
That’s what I saw when I watched him, he looked ok as DM (the way we use them) … but since he scores quite a bit (maybe due to their tactics) it might make him more exciting.Thing is he was decent with us in preseason, i want to know more like full one season with us in double pivot, 10+games as sub/starter, then we can judge fairly.
Feels like there are more people involved in this resurgence. To think its Pioli alone is a stretchWhen the rumors about Rangnick we’re gaining steam we weren’t doing that well at the time. Pioli wasn’t supposed to be a long term option, he was just there to steady the ship. The 5:0 happened with Pioli in charge. Gazidis changed his mind after our lockdown form, which was a big decision at the time. Many of us were shocked when the news that Pioli was staying broke during halftime. At the time it was almost certain that even though the team was playing great, it was still going to be Rangnick. It wasn’t an easy decision, which is why it’s really unfair and weird to blame Gazidis for almost making a blunder. It’s much more reasonable to actually praise him for not being stubborn and changing his mind when the evidence clearly showed Pioli was the man we needed.
That's not the point. Of course he's not entirely the reason, but letting go of Rangnick at that time was both the right decision and also one that was very surprising.Feels like there are more people involved in this resurgence. To think its Pioli alone is a stretch
which means, he actually did not score.Yes he did actually. Came on and scored a header but Pobega was slightly offside and was judged by var to have interfered.
That's the thing I would like to know. With our budget what we have accomplished is something I'm willing to bet all the major clubs are taking notice. So what is it or who is it? We gotta be the most innovative team out there.That's not the point. Of course he's not entirely the reason, but letting go of Rangnick at that time was both the right decision and also one that was very surprising.
Jeff Bezos went on to explain that the smartest people he’s observed were always “revising their understanding, reconsidering a problem they thought they’d already solved. They’re open to new points of view, new information, new ideas, contradictions, and challenges to their own way of thinking”That's not the point. Of course he's not entirely the reason, but letting go of Rangnick at that time was both the right decision and also one that was very surprising.
So clichéJeff Bezos went on to explain that the smartest people he’s observed were always “revising their understanding, reconsidering a problem they thought they’d already solved. They’re open to new points of view, new information, new ideas, contradictions, and challenges to their own way of thinking”
Consequential
What did I say that was wrong? I said it was disallowed.which means, he actually did not score.
no one counts offside goal
Hard to believe that Sanches going to be Kessie replacement. He's more of offensive player, and rather injury prone. Double pivot consist of Tonali, Adli, Bennie, and Sanches would be too light (even if we add Pobega, who he himself is more attack minded). It would make more sense if we sign him for RW.
I think Adli (unless emergency) will be playing AM Not in the double pivot.Hard to believe that Sanches going to be Kessie replacement. He's more of offensive player, and rather injury prone. Double pivot consist of Tonali, Adli, Bennie, and Sanches would be too light (even if we add Pobega, who he himself is more attack minded). It would make more sense if we sign him for RW.
Yeah I know. I only listed him as every possible player who can play at double pivot on our rosterI think Adli (unless emergency) will be playing AM Not in the double pivot.
Boban made him change his mind....When the rumors about Rangnick we’re gaining steam we weren’t doing that well at the time. Pioli wasn’t supposed to be a long term option, he was just there to steady the ship. The 5:0 happened with Pioli in charge. Gazidis changed his mind after our lockdown form, which was a big decision at the time. Many of us were shocked when the news that Pioli was staying broke during halftime. At the time it was almost certain that even though the team was playing great, it was still going to be Rangnick. It wasn’t an easy decision, which is why it’s really unfair and weird to blame Gazidis for almost making a blunder. It’s much more reasonable to actually praise him for not being stubborn and changing his mind when the evidence clearly showed Pioli was the man we needed.
Definitely a great point. Maldini showed the same when he fired Giampaolo like immediately, recognizing that he had made a mistake in appointing him and correcting course as fast as possible.When the rumors about Rangnick we’re gaining steam we weren’t doing that well at the time. Pioli wasn’t supposed to be a long term option, he was just there to steady the ship. The 5:0 happened with Pioli in charge. Gazidis changed his mind after our lockdown form, which was a big decision at the time. Many of us were shocked when the news that Pioli was staying broke during halftime. At the time it was almost certain that even though the team was playing great, it was still going to be Rangnick. It wasn’t an easy decision, which is why it’s really unfair and weird to blame Gazidis for almost making a blunder. It’s much more reasonable to actually praise him for not being stubborn and changing his mind when the evidence clearly showed Pioli was the man we needed.
doubt he will end here,Hard to believe that Sanches is going to be Kessie's replacement. He's more of offensive player, and rather injury prone. Double pivot consist of Tonali, Adli, Bennie, and Sanches would be too light (even if we add Pobega, who he himself is more attacking minded). It would make more sense if we sign him for RW.
It will be interesting to see what will happen. Maldini buys only strictly calculated moves. And doesnt over pay. Our luck is that Lille and Milan co operate so well.I think Sanches will not happen like all rumors pre-mercato.
Ooh, ultmimo nutmeggio
fuck thomas lemar