@helloAgain
people remember milan when was good/great but i think its more about stability as milan can have with normal management and owner.
stability like other clubs in italy dont show - i mean even good squads like lazio, roma, napoli (atalanta not to mention) never make step forward to be better.
roma was in ucl year after year... did they make team better overall? no, they sold salah and replace him with under, kluivert etc shit players. what about nianggolan, strootman, gervinho, ddr... today they have miki, pastore and pedro
its like watching berlu milan in lower scale
napoli had a real team under sarri with gonzalo and hamsik and then what??
hamsik left, later gonzalo... team for next years relied on mertens, insignie, callejon, always injured and average milik and no much other offensive quality from midfield. this players were not good enough for winning scudetto or coppa and wont ever do anything in ucl ko. they didnt qualify to ucl and then decide for some serious changes ...
lazio?? atalanta??
just if you want to be successful you need to develop your squad over and over again. its not mean buying stars each transfer window but just look on your team overall and make it better - better subs, replace ageing players, keep balance between proven players and players that didnt win anything.
look on barca when messi cant win alone match, real when they didnt change players because they are a winners, juve with lacking quality and ageing players. this teams with money just stop develop their squads in smart way.