Yes idiots in management.What? Is it a dry sale with no buyback?
We off load a mediocre player to non rival team who's playing the Europa League post while we're aiming the scudetto; We're getting back what we paid for him AND dodging a minusvalenzeWill someone please explain again how the terms of this deal were favorable to Milan?
Nope. We’re loaning out the player to a rival team and if the player in fact turns out to be mediocre we’re getting him back next season.We off load a mediocre player to non rival team who's playing the Europa League post while we're aiming the scudetto; We're getting back what we paid for him AND dodging a minusvalenze
It is a shit deal. But with 0 goals and 1 assist in 30 odd games there is not much we can do.Will someone please explain again how the terms of this deal were favorable to Milan?
A player who clearly was on a downward curve here at Milan and had no future under Pioli. Best we managed to get rid before his value started plummeting even further. Sometimes you get lucky with a buyer to take our expensive outcasts ala Piatek €27m from Hertha, Paqueta €26m from Lyon or Suso €24m from Sevilla, this time we did not and we had to settle for a loan move at a club where a lot of players tend to succeed. If we had no buyers on a permanent deal (talking about numbers close to €25m+ to avoid minusvalenza), why would we loan him to the likes of PSV, Sociedad or Fulham over Atalanta if our sole intention is to recoup the majority of the money we spent on him?Will someone please explain again how the terms of this deal were favorable to Milan?
Paqueta is no way worth anything more than 40 mil.A player who clearly was on a downward curve here at Milan and had no future under Pioli. Best we managed to get rid before his value started plummeting even further. Sometimes you get lucky with a buyer to take our expensive outcasts ala Piatek €27m from Hertha, Paqueta €26m from Lyon or Suso €24m from Sevilla, this time we did not and we had to settle for a loan move at a club where a lot of players tend to succeed. If we had no buyers on a permanent deal (talking about numbers close to €25m+ to avoid minusvalenza), why would we loan him to the likes of PSV, Sociedad or Fulham over Atalanta if our sole intention is to recoup the majority of the money we spent on him?
As for the semantics of the deal - If we had loaned him without any option to buy, Atalanta would undeniably be less interested in taking a punt on him and wouldn't continuously play him through tough times as we did - given he was our player and a huge investment. I mean the numbers we're talking about: €3m loan fee + €24m buy-out option + €4m bonuses and 10% future resale - are hardly a pittance if they buy him from us.
By the way, I've been reading about Paqueta being linked to Man City for €100m in recent weeks and I have absolutely no regret about him, just as I'll have with CDK.
He's serie a fodder level at bestthe same guy we've always had here
and theres still plebs here that think cdk is fodder
what poor man management this was man what the fuck
that bald alcoholic should be arrested and questioned on what exactly he was thinking with cdk and adli... moron
the guy wasn't given a single chance to play CF, he was never even allowed to drift to the left because thats where leao is when he played as a 10. i have so many quesions. this guys characteristics + movement were perfect to complement leao
in some ideal world we get de zerbi and cdk comes back next year after banging 15-20 goals for atalanta
He definitely was fodder last season. And when we let him go you would think we would sign an actual replacement at the same level of potential.the same guy we've always had here
and theres still plebs here that think cdk is fodder
what poor man management this was man what the fuck
that bald alcoholic should be arrested and questioned on what exactly he was thinking with cdk and adli... moron
the guy wasn't given a single chance to play CF, he was never even allowed to drift to the left because thats where leao is when he played as a 10. i have so many quesions. this guys characteristics + movement were perfect to complement leao
in some ideal world we get de zerbi and cdk comes back next year after banging 15-20 goals for atalanta
Naw, Ilicic and Gomez had the swag and balls to be a star player, albeit not at a topclub.He's serie a fodder level at best
Might have a Illicic/gomez type career
Nothing more
Kaka - shy introverted player who can't make it at a top club.Naw, Ilicic and Gomez had the swag and balls to be a star player, albeit not at a topclub.
Charles is too introverted for such a career. See him more as a Saelamakers type.
Charles is too introverted for such a career. See him more as a Saelamakers type.
rnb gaslighting at its perfectionthe guy wasn't given a single chance to play CF, he was never even allowed to drift to the left because thats where leao is when he played as a 10. i have so many quesions. this guys characteristics + movement were perfect to complement leao
He is missing way less sitters at Atalanta.rnb gaslighting at its perfection
guy missed sitters in cl matches and serie a
he's missing way less vs frosinoneHe is missing way less sitters at Atalanta.
Missing sitters = confidence issues.
Confidence issues = manager not doing his job.
Ironic, huh?
sure, i bet pioli's kind uncle approach destroyed him, and conte's stern attitude will make him perform all of a sudden.He is missing way less sitters at Atalanta.
Missing sitters = confidence issues.
Confidence issues = manager not doing his job.
Ironic, huh?