- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 54,582
- Reaction score
- 356
easy group, worst case scenario they draw some random team in the playoffs and beat them.
just like how you sounded like a broken record hating on the GOAT for 2 years.
Hopefully conte wins all the trophies with chelsea (minus CL if milan have a shot)
I agree that he chose his squad but I think Berrardi could have been useful specially for subs who can make an impact.obviously should have called up future ballon d'or winners like berardi and marco benassi, don't forget romangoli whos the future nesta.
or MLS phenemenon sebastian giovinco.
I'm going to give necro credit, he and I knew that conte's call ups were spot on for his tactics
the rest of you should quit football and watch hockey instead, let the real football connoisseurs enjoy it. /MB
obviously should have called up future ballon d'or winners like berardi and marco benassi, don't forget romangoli whos the future nesta.
or MLS phenemenon sebastian giovinco.
I'm going to give necro credit, he and I knew that conte's call ups were spot on for his tactics
the rest of you should quit football and watch hockey instead, let the real football connoisseurs enjoy it. /MB
Who else is he gonna call? Milan subs like poli as some wanted after Uruguay match in the world cup?
The moment u go beyond Italy's defense which is all juve + de sciglio u find work horses that galliani would give allegri wet dreams about. Italjuve is italjuve for hold reason.
No one is talking about bbc.
He chose sturaro instead of jorginho.
I can somewhat understand why he would start pelle, but why eder instead of insigne?
Where was bonaventura, you know those three had good seasons compared to contes preferred ones.
At the end of the day his odd player selections and subs failed him. and he is to blame.
I am actually surprised how Pep didnt sign Bonucci so far in his career.
No one is talking about bbc.
He chose sturaro instead of jorginho.
I can somewhat understand why he would start pelle, but why eder instead of insigne?
Where was bonaventura, you know those three had good seasons compared to contes preferred ones.
At the end of the day his odd player selections and subs failed him. and he is to blame.
Funny thing is some of these people that are fapping over conte don't rate allegri. How..![]()
Funny thing is some of these people that are fapping over conte don't rate allegri. How..![]()
No you don't get it
He did not need players that hold the ball on their feet
he chosed the players that suited the best to his game play
because there is a huge difference between them
"Failed him" . That's funny when Eder was the one that gave them the win against sweden. It's pretty obvious why he prefers those players to ones u mentioned.
He builds his team defense up. Defense is more about work and positioning than on the ball skills.
He sees clear trade-off between skill and work rate. And frankly, the skill level of the players u mentioned don't justify the loss in work rate that he gets from the players he did use. Just because a player can dribble doesn't mean he is good for the team.
NO one failed and he didn't make any wrong team selection choice. Guaranteed u chumps would have put SeS , bona and insigne ahead of giaccherini. Yet none of them fit into this team like he does.... like they all do.
He chose work-rate over skill but where did that get him.
I am not taking anything away from him and I was impressed by what he has done against spain and belgium, but he should have done better against the germans. Making his first sub in the 90th minute, and the last two in the last half of extra time.. He wanted penalty shootouts yes but at the end of the day he lost. Let us if he can win the chl with that mentality. Lol
And yes insigne is much better player than eder, and he would indeed have done better. But i guess he doesn't fit in to contes "run and defend" system.
I do not rate them higher either but Allegri did better for Ladri to be exact and it seems it is going to continue with the pieces that fit their 3-5-2.
Everybody knows that Conte called the players that fit their system. But you never can count on the stupidity of a Boateng/Granqvist to give you a freebie on every game.
Funny thing is some of these people that are fapping over conte don't rate allegri. How..![]()
If only Conte took Poli with him...insigne has to be the most overrated player in serie A.
Because that's what they did every game? Pointless nitpicking. Yes the system had his flaws but this was an epic Italia side, the games against Belgium and especially Spain are big accomplishments and I feel by eliminating Spain and not Germany we could have decided the outcome of the tournament or at least had an important role in it. Eder and Giaccherini did their role well.
insigne has to be the most overrated player in serie A.
Epic is definitely the word. I put down Giac going into this tournament and he comes out flying as if he was the player I remember liking a few years ago. Eder came out and played a crucial part. Despite his (relatively few) detractors, Pelle proved that he could play at the highest level.
There were obviously disappointments and players who shouldn't have been picked, namely Parolo who would have been better off warming the bench. However, for the most part, this side came out and made their mark despite being a mediocre side on paper. Just unfortunate it had to end this way.