Which fake account did you fall for this time?According to Belgian sports media today, De Ketelaere is already Milan's! Clubs have agreed: 28M + 2M bonus based on the number of appearances.
The player has also agreed for a 5-year contract with a salary of 2.5M euros per season. Within the week the player has to travel to Milan for medical visits.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Huh? How is it not applicable? We increased our revenues dramatically compared to 4 years ago even without big fire sales, mind you. Those increased revenues allowed us to strenghthen and invest heavy money in players like Tomori or Tonali in the midst of a world wide financial crisis without the necessity of selling our most valued players like Leao or Theo first – unlike Inter, who spends more money on players than we do but who has to sell their most prestigious pieces for the sake of surviving. That's why we could catch up and even close the gap to Inter. That's why we could aim and even win the Scudetto. By doing so we increased our revenues again like seen in the new fantastic deal with Puma who brings us way more money over the next 5 years than selling a player in a one-off. And with that money we're going to improve our squad, again, without the necessity to sell before, which hopefully will bring us even more success and more revenues – no matter how much you want to moan about Messias and Saele and act like we're weaker than two years ago with Suso and Castillejo.
If sales can be done at the right conditions it's wellcomed. If we could have sold Kessie for 50M last season or Donnarumma for 50M the season before, that would have been wellcomed and cool and all of that. That's not what I'm debating.
But given all the circumstances (I'm not going through them again) we weren't getting offers who would have allowed us to actually improve the sporting performances of the squad. Again: If the best offer we get for a Kessie in his last year is 15M, how does that help us replacing his sporting value/contribution with an even better player? It doesn't. So instead we chosed to run his contract down. We let those 15M slip, so to speak, but we didn't downgrade the sporting level of the team neither. That's key. Decisions like that helped us secure CL two years ago and Scudetto this year. That helped us increase our revenue streams massively. That's the whole point of success brings you substaintional money, not sales. Sales, as seen now with Inter, or in our own past with Zlatan and Thiago Silva, can even hurt our success when done under the wrong conditions.
So again: What exactely isn't applicable?
But it is solely what am debating & Milan should do better there.If sales can be done at the right conditions it's wellcomed. If we could have sold Kessie for 50M last season or Donnarumma for 50M the season before, that would have been wellcomed and cool and all of that. That's not what I'm debating.
The Sanches story seems weird. I can't believe a rich club like PSG is haggling with Lille for a player that will cost 10-15M? They would've locked him up by now.These days every reporter is exhausting, feels like nobody has any clue when it comes to us. I did not hear a single rumour regarding the departure of Samu and Caldara, from one day to another both are gone.
And for CDK and Sanches they are just reporting the same bs for weeks, inventing some random numbers.
I love and hate our management for operating so quietly.
on profit would be too bad deal for usDepends if its 15% of the whole sum or just the profit
I know what Campos wants to do with PSG, he wants to make them a more functional team, but that would require getting rid of one of Neymar or Messi. Not because they're not talented, and even Neymar, with his diminishing powers (I think he just has too many miles from such a young age) he's still an incredible player. Messi, I'm sure you can get more out of him next year, he'll be more settled--which is an absurd statement to say about someone who is supposed to be the GOAT, but I digress.The Sanches story seems weird. I can't believe a rich club like PSG is haggling with Lille for a player that will cost 10-15M? They would've locked him up by now.
Wonder what was Kaka's 1st salary at Milan.The player has also agreed for a 5-year contract with a salary of 2.5M euros per season.
The Sanches story seems weird. I can't believe a rich club like PSG is haggling with Lille for a player that will cost 10-15M? They would've locked him up by now.
I think Neymar and Messi will probably leave PSG in a year.I know what Campos wants to do with PSG, he wants to make them a more functional team, but that would require getting rid of one of Neymar or Messi. Not because they're not talented, and even Neymar, with his diminishing powers (I think he just has too many miles from such a young age) he's still an incredible player. Messi, I'm sure you can get more out of him next year, he'll be more settled--which is an absurd statement to say about someone who is supposed to be the GOAT, but I digress.
Neymar and Messi don't run. They just don't. I think you can handle two non-runners, one of them obviously being Mbappe. But Messi and Neymar?
PSG didn't beat a single team in the top nine away-from-home last year in Ligue 1. That's insane.
All they needed to do is to get rid of Neymar & keep Di Maria.I know what Campos wants to do with PSG, he wants to make them a more functional team, but that would require getting rid of one of Neymar or Messi. Not because they're not talented, and even Neymar, with his diminishing powers (I think he just has too many miles from such a young age) he's still an incredible player. Messi, I'm sure you can get more out of him next year, he'll be more settled--which is an absurd statement to say about someone who is supposed to be the GOAT, but I digress.
Neymar and Messi don't run. They just don't. I think you can handle two non-runners, one of them obviously being Mbappe. But Messi and Neymar?
PSG didn't beat a single team in the top nine away-from-home last year in Ligue 1. That's insane.
Could be but squad size never stopped them in the past lol.I think they have to get rid of one or two midfielders before they can sign Sanches after signing Vitinha. That's why midfielders like Rafinha, Gueye and Wijnaldum are not on tour with PSG.
After World Cup psg will slow down, maybe sell the club all together. Their other company Bein is only holding epl, French and la liga and there are talks they won’t bid after current contract expiry.I think Neymar and Messi will probably leave PSG in a year.
And leave Mbappé on a huge salary back.After World Cup psg will slow down, maybe sell the club all together.
That’ll be somebody else’s problem.And leave Mbappé on a huge salary back.
There will still be atrocities to cover up after the WC.After World Cup psg will slow down, maybe sell the club all together.
I think Neymar and Messi will probably leave PSG in a year.
And posters like you are to blameQaas, I'm worried about you, this is how many personalities you have shown:
Or maybe this is how you decide what persona to use.
You're missing the point...Ziyech is a huge upgrade on both Salad/Messias which is undeniable (although that says more about the latter's incompetency rather than Ziyech's quality). However, he's a Rebic level talent at best i.e. a game changer on his day but still inconsistent. Therefore, unless we relax our wage cap and transfer fee ceiling to accommodate top young talents who can make the difference NOW i.e. Diaby, the alternative is to rely on short-term solutions like Ziyech or wait for a promising young talent with reasonable wages like CDK + Leao to explode which could take a few seasons or not happen at all e.g. Brahim. Therefore, at some point MMM will have to be more daring in the market (which is what Paolo alluded to with his '2-3 significant signings' comment) or risk playing the waiting game.stop your anti-Ziyech agenda, judge him after half a season in serie a, not after playing in a system that doesnt fit him.
15m for Serge is not just absurd, its disgusting. Salah who is levels above Gnabry earns a bit over 10mil. Havertz who is 10 times the talent Gnabry ever was, earns around 10mil.
I understand you need to pay your top guns better, but paying 15mil for a fucking Gnabry? Oh hell naw
I think Messi was a bad choice, to be honest. Marketing and profile-wise, sure, but on sporting merit? I get why you'd take Messi, but his production for what you're paying him? Poor.All they needed to do is to get rid of Neymar & keep Di Maria.
Mbappe-Messi-Di Maria is actually balanced & they got rid of the player who is behind such balance.
And posters like you are to blame
Who paid dybala 14m request?Who will pay Neymar's massive salary?
He will finally leave for Real and return to a "normal" salary - Everybody winsThat’ll be somebody else’s problem.
Rooting? You just kept pushing me away
Diallo is a very good CB, he's versatile, and he's super intelligent.Yeah not excited for Diallo at all.
That's pretty obvious bro...there's 60m gross wage/amortisation savings from Roma/Kessie/Baka/Ibra leaving, 30m from new sponsors, 20m Serie A prize money, 20m from sales, 65m from CL round of 16 finish etc. which is why there's plenty of money for one or two Scudetto gifts like the good ol' daysMartinelli says this on youtube. I respect him highly. Smart man. So:
Total cost of Milan eventually buying Sanchez, CDK, Ziyech, with wages, while paying annually (which clubs do). Is +- ZERO. When calculated all the wages we got rid off, income of players like Hauge, Samu etc., tax gains etc. If Milan buys these 3 players costs on the balance for this year = 0!
So, now you know. If there is money for anything there is money for even one more real deal, like Bremer etc. As it seems the cost expected from Milan is ZERO.
Let that sink in. Then say what u think...
FM ❤