I did. The numbers you used were reported numbers for other clubs and you didn’t compare them to Milan’s reported numbers but to projections. Deloitte adjusted it upwards after our complaints and moved us to 19th place but this is the current list
1. Manchester City – €644.9m
2. Real Madrid – €640.7m
3. Bayern Munich – €611.4m
4. Barcelona – €582.1m
5. Manchester United – €558m
6. Paris Saint-Germain – €556.2m
7. Liverpool – €550.4m
8. Chelsea – €493.1m
9. Juventus – €433.5m
10. Tottenham – €406.2m
11. Arsenal – €366.5m
12. Borussia Dortmund – €337.6m
13. Atlético Madrid – €332.8m
14. Inter – €330.9m
15. Leicester – €255m
16. West Ham – €221.5m
17. Wolverhampton Wanderers – €219.2m
18. Everton – €218.1m
19. Milan – €216.3m
20. Zenit St. Petersburg – €212m
21. Aston Villa – €207.3m
22. Seville – €199.5m
23. Leeds – €192.7m
24. Roma – €190.4m
25. Atalanta – €187.6m
26. Southampton – €177.5m
27. Borussia Monchengladbach – €177.5m
28. Napoli – €174.5m
29. Newcastle – €170.1m
30. Lazio – €163.5m
Compare reported numbers to reported numbers from the same report. Also fine if you want to discredit the Deloitte report but if you are going to discredit the report then don’t base an “unpacking” write up all on numbers from the same report for every other team. Just don’t compare last reported numbers to optimistic future projections. It creates a distorted picture.
The fact that you clearly don't read what I write means that I'm not going to go to the trouble of proving you wrong, but to summarize:
(1) The 216m that you just copy-and-pasted (which you claim is your "research")
is the number that Milan objected to. Let me be clear: AC Milan DISAGREED with 216 as an accurate number, they said that 260 was a more accurate figure--and AC Milan have been STAGGERING their sponsorship increases, making the 260 lower than it should be, as will 2022's 300 and 2023's (projected) 360.
(2) Other clubs
did not object to these numbers, so, I used the Deloitte numbers as ballpark figures. I did
not use Milan's 2021 numbers as listed by Deloitte,
because Milan disputed them. If Manchester United or Liverpool disputed the numbers, I would not use them either,
but they did NOT dispute them... Therefore,
hopefully you can see the difference, because avoiding an inaccuracy in
one area does not make the rest of the numbers
inaccurate, because the clubs themselves DID NOT dispute them. Milan has done disputed previous years, but they made a point to dispute 2021's--which is why I avoided using those figures.
(3) I do not think you actually understand what I did, because the PROJECTIONS are a reflection of SPONSORSHIPS that we have ALREADY SIGNED, what Gazidis and the accountants are doing is STAGGERING when these new sponsorships come in effect to show GROWTH--the ACTUAL PROJECTIONS that I used were actually in increased MATCHDAY income and
potential INCREASED BROADCAST revenue should Milan continue to participate in the CL. Which is crucial for growth.
I can only conclude that you do not understand or actually grasp what I wrote, if you read it at all, especially since in this post that you replied to me, with a COPY-AND-PASTE of a list--especially as in my original post I wrote of Milan's
OFFICIAL dispute with the reported numbers.
But why am I surprised? You think Renato didn't sign with us because we didn't pay 3m extra to Lille, and not that PSG offered him
double the salary we did. Go figure.