Massaro94
Milan Legend
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 35,110
- Reaction score
- 39,072
- Location
- Grande Britain
- Fav. Players
- Maradona - Caniggia - Goycochea - Batistuta - Veron - Riquleme - Tevez
Never thought that there seem to be more suitors for Estupinan than for Leao TBH.

natural to synthetic while keeping same or better performance
@PBPcalcio tells @MilanVibesIT: "#Milan have flatly denied the reports linking Mazraoui and Zaniolo to the club"
According to @JPercyTelegraph, negotiations for Estupiñán are reportedly at an advanced stage, with Aston Villa hoping to finalise the deal #Milan
To follow this up... It's almost pointless, but more so subjective, if you see someone as the "goat".
I always find it weird that we import Argentinian steak and new Zealand lamb so much...
England had the same leeway to open the game, I think it was fine. Both sides got to see what the limit of the game was going to be. They got away with plenty of card worthy challengesI'm comfortable with players getting red cards in the first minute when they hit other players in the head. I don't think that's about "feeling out the game" when it's a pretty textbook red card and where VAR should be coming in.
But it is about the special treatment favorites get--they are given the license to do things that other players cannot. If an Algerian player hit an Argentine player to "set the tone" or "feel the game" do you think he gets away with it? No. That player has ruined his team's chances because he lost his head and hit another player.
If a player slips and gives up a penalty in the first minute, do we waive it on because it's too early in the game? In a pick-up game, sure, but here? The World Cup?
I don't think England lost this game because of the ref, I think Tuchel should carry the (vast) majority of the blame--but there is still a spectacle when a team is down to ten men.
Why this distinction at minute 72? Who cares? It ruined the spectacle by giving him that yellow for diving. It was the most exciting part of the game.
Didn't the 'best attacker' sink the blow against England?the state of serie a when the „best midfielder“ and world class talent paz can’t sniff a single minute![]()
Haaland walked for 70% of this WC, only bursted in speed when counters were dangerous, and ended with 7 goalsHe isn't running that much though.
Plays in an easy league where he determines where and when he plays and for Argentina he has teammates to expend all the energy - People laugh at Simeone but that was his only job last match.
We can call it drugs but top athletes like Brady and LeBron Modric have shown this in spurts because of what they take and the conditioning they do.
If he was still playing a long season in Europe we wouldn't see this level after a few months.
Never thought that there seem to be more suitors for Estupinan than for Leao TBH.
Spot onTo follow this up... It's almost pointless, but more so subjective, if you see someone as the "goat".
Era's see different iterations of the game. Therefore I could argue that Messi vrs Baresi, Nesta, or Maldini, playing by the rules and leeway afforded to players in the 80s, 90s or early 00s, doesn't perform to the levels afforded to him for saying the last 10-15 years? Similarly Ronaldo, not the fat good one.
For me the like of Gullit, Savicevic, Weah, Kaka, Robaldinho, Ronaldo, Maradona, Laudrup, Ribery, Zidane, etc, all hold more weight in a GOAT conversation, but that's me... And I'm not saying many are close to being an undisputed GOAT, but they played in era's with far more recognised GREAT players.
Messi and Ronaldo you could argue benefitted from marketing and FIFA favouritism?
No doubt Messi is a great player, but he's had a lot of help I'd say?
I find it weird that people support and follow
Players that have no connection to the clubs they supposedly follow?
I absolutely have no affiliation to players that have never played for a club I support.
The standing and simping for Messi, Ronaldo, Pep, etc, I don't get it...
I agree with this. Hope it's just nerves.
Seems a little too early and desperate to be acting like this, no?
I think the big problem is the salary, but it depends on Gerry & co since Ramos benefit from huge one.Just have to say that Foden in that right sided AM spot is perfect.
Which means it’s never going to happen.
What is this shit
I think the big problem is the salary, but it depends on Gerry & co since Ramos benefit from huge one.
That's nothingFoden was the premier league player of the season in 23-24. Yeah, he’s been out of form since, but his level in those couples years was ballon d’or level.
What is this shit
A Epstein island calender book?
I guess I do.Phil Foden? Maybe City like the idea of sending him to Milan, instead of another EPL team, and since he's a youth player, they can accept less of a fee because (1) he's their youth player [so pure profit] and (2) they're selling him to a non-EPL team so less chance of blowback?
Or is this just another case of Milan's name being used to help a player's career? Probably that, right?
Let's say Foden actually is an option, would you guys want him? Let's say we pay 40-50m for him, give him 7m net wages (his current City salary)--do you take that transfer?