Hitman
Milan Legend
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 2,827
You're using Balotelli's goals/assists stats to back up the fact he contributed, which is fine.
But don't you ignore those for Bonaventura and discuss all his limitations? Which is fine too, but then you'd have to consider the negative aspect of Balotelli's performances previously as well.
absolutely correct and spot on. you're absolutely right when you say I rated Balo and Jack differently. but let's take a minute and see why shall we?
i currently don't have a memory or videos of all of balo's performances in his City and Inter days nor does anyone here, so rating his every performance from years ago is rather impossible.... so all I currently have to bring to the table is his goals+assists in the past.
however, I've rated Bonaventura's performances this season after every game. Just check out the player's thread and you'll see me criticizing him (the only 1) even when he scores or assists in a game because for me, the goal doesn't automatically erase the rest of the awful performance he puts in. For 90% of football fans it does though. Galliani, Berlusconi and Miha seem to fall in that 90% - the sporting results over the last 3 years are evidently poor which must mean our sporting evaluation is poor too - as Honda pointed out before he got permabenched for a few months.
Anyways, there's a difference between rating a players performance and his decisiveness. Alo88 said Balo wasn't decisive for Inter nor City when they won the titles and I only provided numbers of the goals to show him that Balo was in fact decisive. I didn't claim that his performances in each of the games were great in Inter & City. I do claim that Bonaventura's performances this season have been horrendous, but 2-3 years from now no one will remember how horrendous Bona's performances were cause all they'll remember are the statistics of his season. They'll just see games played, goals scored, goals assisted.