Is it fair competition for everyone else? Stop emphasizing that they got promoted to PL. In terms of performance on the pitch, does getting promoted to EPL warrant more merit sportingly than winning CL?
They are placed in that league because PL people were the earliest to come out and want to ?Americanize? the game. What?s their feeling of accomplishment there? In Kalac?s own words ?they did a good job marketing?
In other words, Norwich city is allowed to get ?free money? (another one of Kalac?s zingers) because their leagur had great marketing. But when other clubs take advantage of their global fan base and want to form a Super league to catch up with the revenues ?whoa whoa whoa, football is for everyone?
So when newly promoted PL sides can spend about the same as us, and can offer same if not better salary, we are supposed to just run our business better right? And again, in Mr. hypocrite Kalac?s own words that such a league would be pointless Bc poorer sides at best have one year of good run.
Look, I like the idea of SL, but I find that there were lots of holes in execution and planning that can be improved. But these so called arguments against ?Americanization?, ?financial fairness?, ?football not for everyone? are all crocks of shit.
: