I have come to realize that when I respond to counter-arguments, what is defined as "twisted" is either 1) the person did not read what I wrote carefully enough and/or 2) they are sad because I addressed their counter and found it lacking, and they are unable to respond with actual counter-arguments.
Let's take the idea that Tonali is not a DM. My post clearly stated "vaguely DM types" which included players who are not strictly DMs, like Enzo or Gravenberch.
Do you know what's funny? Tonali is playing as a single-pivot DM for Newcastle and has been widely praised, pushing Bruno into a more 8-like position.
The fact that you think my post was about Tonali as if I haven't gotten over him, like I have been pining over him, again, underlines that you are missing the point. I am not the sort of person (nor do I have a track record) of pining for Tonali's return or defending his actions, etc. I don't care that they sold Tonali, sell everyone, but they're bad at selling. If selling players is going to be the cornerstone of their business, they should get better at it.
I'd appreciate it if you'd refrain from talking about what my profession should or should not be, I am not interested in talking about other people's character, I simply like discussing Milan in-depth without the sort of personal elements that you seem compelled to bring in.
Those who I have a rapport with, I gladly joke around with and poke fun at, etc. I do not have this with you, so I'd appreciate it if you kept your commentary to the four corners of the subject matter, which, unfortunately, I believe you have misunderstood.