I'm a bit unfair, I'll admit, but it's the fact he can go from VEEEERY useful in one game for the team to fullblown AIDS in another game that is pissing me off.
However, there's been many games where he's limited the team. C'mon, you can't say it's just a coincidence we played MUCH better without him against Juve this season? We've played some great counterattacking football in almost every game he's been missing.
Milan almost always plays better without Ibra. Last season, our best football was without him. That's one of his flaws, part of the whole 'package', that he always likes the ball at his feet and hogs the ball too much to let the team play any sort of free flowing football.
But all the other options available now are much worse. And don't bring the transfer market because I like to be realistic. I'm speaking about the current players at the club. With them, the best way to go is Ibra+10.
Pato was awesome in last year's 3-0 derby and his form at the end of last season made me consider the thought that the team would eventually be better off without Ibra if/when Pato matures. But you've seen how Pato has regressed.
I'd rather watch Milan games on Thursday night than Ibra+10 on Tuesday nights though.![]()
That's just your opinion and I respect it, but disagree with it.
, but it's the fact he can go from VEEEERY useful in one game for the team to fullblown AIDS in another game that is pissing me off.
Now there is no alternative to Ibra
