Cloren
Milan Legend
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2016
- Messages
- 12,815
- Reaction score
- 58,413
- Fav. Players
- Roger Federer is the GOAT
“Realistic” for what goal?
Top 4 and going into the knockouts in CL? Aren’t we too ambitious for that? And if the goal is same as Pioli, but you’d have to both pay Pioli off and hire this new person, might as well just keep Pioli.
Affordable how?
Guys never been out of South America, let alone experience coaching in Italy. What if he fails the objective? We don’t have to look at the cost of missing out in CL knockouts and money from matches lost like we have to factor in when replacing Pioli? This argument that we can afford to fire Pioli if you just factor in other income lost due to losing, does it not apply to Gallardo or any of these replacements?
If he fails, do we eat the loss and give him one more season or fire him right away. If we fire him right away, we’d be paying both Pioli and his severance. If we give him another season, we risk missing out on more CL money as this guy has never shown he can get top 4 in Serie A.
Hiring every new coach always comes with a risk. We can be worse, or we can be better. We truly won’t know. There will be no guarantees.
Hiring Ange was a risk Spurs took and it worked out well for them. Hiring Potter was a risk Chelsea took and it didn’t work out. It’s impossible to know.
This is where the management comes in and assess the situation.
With Pioli we have had 4 years of his coaching and we have an idea of how he works and we think he isn’t good enough anymore.
With others coaches, there is a chance they can be much superior to Pioli. Also a chance they can be worse, it’s up to the management to think that risk is worth it.
But again, I do not necessarily want to fire Pioli right now. I’m suggesting this in the event we don’t make it out of CL groups. In that event, to me you have to fire him asap.

