Maldini&Inzaghi said:I am watching the USA Brazil game and Pato is just a little guy! I can't beleive how tiny he is. Either he is small or the americans are huge.
He is 1m80, so pretty average. Taller, than pippo, seedorf, pirlo, gattuso, etc.
Maldini&Inzaghi said:I am watching the USA Brazil game and Pato is just a little guy! I can't beleive how tiny he is. Either he is small or the americans are huge.
magashi said:Afaik, tuttomercato ain't amongst the most reliable sources, but Pato going to Inter is quite logical, so I wouldn't be so surprised if it's true.

Kinda imposible to explain but still a lot of ppl prefer INter over Milan.....i.e: SuazoFyrstnissen said:And why is a move to inter logical?
I'd say our chances of signing him are much better, seeing that kaka and ronaldo is his greatest idols. And if you were to pick between the current champions of europe, who has two of your biggest idols
OR
A club with a shitty atitude, and a scum player roster, who mainly won the Seria A because all the major rivals for the title had been handicapped.
The choice don't seem all that hard to me.
ACMCEAR said:Kinda imposible to explain but still a lot of ppl prefer INter over Milan.....i.e: Suazo
magashi said:Second, he knows he'll be in the starting eleven right away, while we are expected to pull a Gourcuff on him, leaving him to rot on the bench for a few seasons.
Speak for yourselfmagashi said:Yup, but we all know A hates young players and he won't get his chance in the next 1-2 years (or his "chance" will equal 4-5 matches per year). While in Merda, he won't be the first name on the sheet, but will be rotated with the other and, if proves his form, he'll get to play regularly.
magashi said:You said if a young player is good, he'll play, but will not if he ain't good and gave Pato for example. So, I take Gourcuff ain't good and that's the reason he didn't play last season, not because he isn't 27+yo?
What I say, is he didn't get a chance this season. This is what would happen to Pato, too, he's even younger.
magashi said:You said if a young player is good, he'll play, but will not if he ain't good and gave Pato for example. So, I take Gourcuff ain't good and that's the reason he didn't play last season, not because he isn't 27+yo?
What I say, is he didn't get a chance this season. This is what would happen to Pato, too, he's even younger.
Edi said:Well even with his injury Gourcuff managed to put 21 games behind his name this season...Is this little for a rookie in Seria A?
If it wasnt for the injury he would have even played more...
I'm afraid your arguments are weak....
So what if the games were as a sub?Atleast he played a fair amount of games for his first season....magashi said:I am afraid most of these games are coming as sub, if I am not mistaken. At least I don't remember him starting in Serie A that often (although he played quite regularly in CL group phase).
.
magashi said:I am afraid most of these games are coming as sub, if I am not mistaken. At least I don't remember him starting in Serie A that often (although he played quite regularly in CL group phase).
Kaka is an exception, Gila wasn't THAT young (can't compare 23yo and 17yo).
magashi said:Inter will give the money required, to start with. Second, he knows he'll be in the starting eleven right away, while we are expected to pull a Gourcuff on him, leaving him to rot on the bench for a few seasons. Third, he won't be the first player Inter signed just before our noses (Ibrahimovic, Suazo). There's probably more, but here are the main reasons I wouldn't be surprised if merda manage to snatch him too.
And that thing with the Brazilians doesn't work anymore. Last time I checked merda had no Hondurans and Swedes. They used the old-fashioned way - money. We should also try it.
magashi said:@Fyrstnissen - Inter gave chances to their new signings last year (Ibra, Crespo) even though they had Adriano, Martins and Cruz in the team. We didn't rate our signings that good, although I admit they were much more disappointing than Inter's. That's why I am sure Pato will get his fair chance at the first 11 fast.
As for the "hondurans and swedes" stuff, my point was that having other players from the same nationality ain't that tempting as money and I'm not really happy we bet on this strategy. See, I don't believe Henry went to Barca to play with Giuly but rather for money. We should get out of that romantic stuff if we're to succeed in summer markets and not get more Oliveira's.
BMWTaylor said:Something must be going on behind the scenes that's turned us into such cheapskates the past few years.
When you think about it, since 2005, have ANY of our offseason/January transfers really panned out? They've either been busts (Vieri, Oli, Amoroso), left to rot on the bench (Gourcuff) or just plain pointless (Grimi, Ba).
I'm not giving Ronaldo a free pass, either, until he earns his stripes in a full season of Serie A and the CL.
Milanista10 said:italians got screwed over with the lire becoming into the euro. the lire was very strong, one of the strongets currencies in the world like the GBP. but the euro fucked them over, prices are the same as before but the currency is much weaker, and the taxes have been incresed since then therefore the economy in italy has been going through very difficult times. it's not because we don't want, it's because we can't. Inter are only signing stars that are in Italy, (suazo, ibra, viera) etc. When was the last time a big name player was signed by inter, milan or juve that was a great star and in his prime that was signed from outside the peninsula. A very long time back. It's the economy in italy that is faultering.
however that does not hide the fatc that milan isn't buying quality players while inter and juve are. Milan is not willing to take risks like juve or inter because they believe they can win with the same set of players. And the fact is...they can. The core of the squad has been the same for just over half a decade, and milan is winning. teams like inter and real that change every year haven't won much.
I would still love to see some good players come here altogether though.
Fyrstnissen said:What are you talking about? The Lire was one of the worst currencies in all of Europe! As i remember, 100 lire was like 3,9 danish kroner! And Danish kroner is a pretty average currency in Europe. So I don't think that they got screwed over by switching to the euro.
Yeah, I agree.Fyrstnissen said:What are you talking about? The Lire was one of the worst currencies in all of Europe! As i remember, 100 lire was like 3,9 danish kroner! And Danish kroner is a pretty average currency in Europe. So I don't think that they got screwed over by switching to the euro.