We can not blame our attackers because they didn't get enough chances to do something. We could blame our mid, after all they were there to connect our defenders with the attackers. And Dinho was being bad also. So, we could blame Dinho too for us not to be able to score against Madrid.
However, we could blame Seedorf for two goals we conceded against Madrid (blame Seedorf because we didn't get a draw). First, Seedorf opened the wall. Then because we were conceded on the early minutes, we were panicked thus we conceded the second goal.
I agree, we cannot blame it all on Seedorf, because he couldn't help it for being useless against Madrid. But to blame it on the attackers is ridiculous, they simply didn't get enough chances to score. But, Seedorf did, he got the only (if I'm not mistaken) 1-on-1 chance to score, of course, not surprisingly, he failed to score. So, the Seedorf's mistakes were like 50% why we lost against Madrid. The other 40% was because Allegri still believes that Seedorf and Dinho would do good, further more until Seedorf played full 90 minutes. The other 10% surely because Dinho and our other players couldn't penetrate Madrid defence. If we could, we would get a draw.
But as I said, we conceded 2 goals was mostly because of Seedorf. And blaming it on Pato for making the foul? No. There was possibility that the opponent would score if Pato didn't trip him. But opening a wall, is the most error a player could do. Surely not Ibra fault as he was jumping and out of the way of the ball. Seedorf deliberately opened the wall, surely it was his fault and it lead to the second goal. Maybe, we should all blame it on Allegri to play Seedorf as the starter. Seedorf is a sub, not a first team player when against strong teams.
If only Allegri didn't use Seedorf, I'm sure the result would be different. After all Allegri is the one who decided who start first. Or is it? Maybe Seedorf was full of confidence that he thought he should played full 90 minutes against Madrid? I hope now Seedorf realized, that he's not as good as he thought he was so.
However, I still believe that Seedorf could be used when we against weak teams. Now it looks like that we need mid that could connect defenders and attackers than a FB.
Sorry, Senatore_M84. As much as I like or appreciate your intelligent way of thinking, I still believe that Seedorf is the one to blame for our lost.