The Rumour Commode XI

[ajeya]

What do you guys think about fabian Schar, is he good?

 

[Lord7God]

Serious calcio hey lol. Milan regret not buying dybala when they had the chance.

He's a promosing young player so Milan SERIOUSLY won't sign or try to sign him..thats not SRS Calcio

 

[Mario]

Dybala is an incredible talent but no chance Palermo paid 11m for him 3 years ago and were very patient. Zampa will wait and probably sell him for as much as he sold Pastore for

Palermo have a lot of interesting players tho.. Lazaar the LB is very good, Vazquez is a very interesting player that makes the difference.

---------------

Basel's Schar who is a free agent at the end of this year said that his wish is to move to a top Italian club (he said Milan, Inter or Juve).
He won't be renewing.

 

[joyrider]

Offload 2 cm's and buy dchar in the winter.

 

[Montolivo]

lol. Nadal GOAT? in what world? in a swagger world?

Federer has more slams, he has most weeks at number 1 in the history, most world tour finals wins, while nadal has zero lol.

H2H doesn't count for shit. Its the titles that matter in the end and federer beats nadal in ALL kind of records you can find in tennis.

Davydenko has a winning h2h against nadal, while federer has 19-2 against davydenko. You see how little h2h means?

Its all about match ups in h2h.

Nadal is a untalented shithead who plays the most boring tennis of all, thats why he is injured half a season cause he grinds thorugh his matches,moonballing and shit. Im glad Djokovic has put him in his place over the years.

Nadal may be the best on clay, but federer is the GOAT in tennis. One of the best athletes of all time too, I can't recall so many that has been as dominant as he has been in sports.

 

[Montolivo]

Dybala is an incredible talent but no chance Palermo paid 11m for him 3 years ago and were very patient. Zampa will wait and probably sell him for as much as he sold Pastore for

Palermo have a lot of interesting players tho.. Lazaar the LB is very good, Vazquez is a very interesting player that makes the difference.

---------------

Basel's Schar who is a free agent at the end of this year said that his wish is to move to a top Italian club (he said Milan, Inter or Juve).
He won't be renewing.

yes, I have been saying for two seasons now that someone needs to get dybala. He is the new sergio aguero. but we will never go through with this signing, I see Manchester City or PSG signing him

 

[Soldier_of_god]

lol. Nadal GOAT? in what world? in a swagger world?

Federer has more slams, he has most weeks at number 1 in the history, most world tour finals wins, while nadal has zero lol.

H2H doesn't count for shit. Its the titles that matter in the end and federer beats nadal in ALL kind of records you can find in tennis.

Davydenko has a winning h2h against nadal, while federer has 19-2 against davydenko. You see how little h2h means?

Its all about match ups in h2h.

Nadal is a untalented shithead who plays the most boring tennis of all, thats why he is injured half a season cause he grinds thorugh his matches,moonballing and shit. Im glad Djokovic has put him in his place over the years.

Nadal may be the best on clay, but federer is the GOAT in tennis. One of the best athletes of all time too, I can't recall so many that has been as dominant as he has been in sports.

i cant be fucked going through this again but you are :

wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong

Nadal will make federer cry again when he faces him next year. besides i clearly talked about having a winning h2h over your closest arch rivals not fucking random phaggots who aren't your main nemesis. Nadal will make federer his bitch till eternity. Same applies to djoker, when it matters, even the mighty djoker cant withstand the pitbull from spain.
NADal is the greatest athlete in tennis history, not federer, fuck off lol. Nadal will be crowned as the greatest player ever on earth when he wins his 16th slam. he doesnt need to match federer's slam count cause of the h2h. lastly, H2H matters alot, especially in individual sport. H2H against your main rivals matters. not only does nadal have a winning record against federer, he is 40 - 27 against the top 4 opposition. federer, conversely, is 34 - 45 . big game player my ass. Nadal will annihilate any player from any era when he is on form. Salute the greatest player ever.

 

[Tadej]

Dybala is an incredible talent but no chance Palermo paid 11m for him 3 years ago and were very patient. Zampa will wait and probably sell him for as much as he sold Pastore for

Palermo have a lot of interesting players tho.. Lazaar the LB is very good, Vazquez is a very interesting player that makes the difference.

---------------

Basel's Schar who is a free agent at the end of this year said that his wish is to move to a top Italian club (he said Milan, Inter or Juve).
He won't be renewing.

More like this...

“I need a team with important prospects. I’d like the Bundesliga, Premier League or top Italian clubs like Inter, Milan and Juventus. I couldn’t say no."

http://www.football-italia.net/58080/schär-inter-milan-or-juve

 

[Montolivo]

i cant be fucked going through this again but you are :

wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong

Nadal will make federer cry again when he faces him next year. besides i clearly talked about having a winning h2h over your closest arch rivals not fucking random phaggots who aren't your main nemesis. Nadal will make federer his bitch till eternity. Same applies to djoker, when it matters, even the mighty djoker cant withstand the pitbull from spain.
NADal is the greatest athlete in tennis history, not federer, fuck off lol. Nadal will be crowned as the greatest player ever on earth when he wins his 16th slam. he doesnt need to match federer's slam count cause of the h2h. lastly, H2H matters alot, especially in individual sport. H2H against your main rivals matters. not only does nadal have a winning record against federer, he is 40 - 27 against the top 4 opposition. federer, conversely, is 34 - 45 . big game player my ass. Nadal will annihilate any player from any era when he is on form. Salute the greatest player ever.

I just gave an example with davydenko to show how H2h can be fucked up.

No, nadal is not the greatest. All statistics goes against you, cause nadal has nothing on federer when it COMES TO TITLES, you get that? Titles is what matters in the END. Who the fuck cares if Inter wins Milan both games this season but Milan wins the league? its the damn title that matters in the end.

Federer has been consistent on all surfaces, while nadal crashes out faster than Kubot outside FO. You know that Federer and nadal has never met in Us Open? Why is that? cause nadal is not consistent enough to get to meet federer. While federer has been in multiple FO finals and met nadal there. Also they have only met 3 times on grass, with federer having 2-1 in H2h there, also on carpets (wich has been removed) federer leads 2-0 there. So on fast courts federer has a winning record against nadal 4-1.

The h2h between them is misleading cause nadal has played against federer on his best surface 15 times, while federer has only met him three times on grass. And I recall, cause nadal sucks on grass and cant get past the first rounds.

Nadal will never be greater than fed. He is declining now and gets more and more injuries, wich can harm his personal life. Thats why we will see nadal less on the tour. He will never pass federer in terms of slams, or be greater. Nothing favours nadal in that.

 

[Montolivo]

swagger, is nadal winning djokovic when it matters? hahaha.

Djokovic leads 12-10 in finals against nadal.

 

[KujaIX]

i cant be fucked going through this again but you are :

wrong
wrong
wrong
wrong

Nadal will make federer cry again when he faces him next year. besides i clearly talked about having a winning h2h over your closest arch rivals not fucking random phaggots who aren't your main nemesis. Nadal will make federer his bitch till eternity. Same applies to djoker, when it matters, even the mighty djoker cant withstand the pitbull from spain.
NADal is the greatest athlete in tennis history, not federer, fuck off lol. Nadal will be crowned as the greatest player ever on earth when he wins his 16th slam. he doesnt need to match federer's slam count cause of the h2h. lastly, H2H matters alot, especially in individual sport. H2H against your main rivals matters. not only does nadal have a winning record against federer, he is 40 - 27 against the top 4 opposition. federer, conversely, is 34 - 45 . big game player my ass. Nadal will annihilate any player from any era when he is on form. Salute the greatest player ever.

H2H means fuck all when your records ain't equal. Plus, you see the utter ridiculousness of H2H when Davydenko solidly beats him and Fed annihilates Davydenko but is bad against Nadal. It's a match-up and that's all. Fed's unfortunate in that his greatest rival is his worst possible match-up.

You go on and on about Nadal having more Masters titles but ignore Fed smashing him on YEC titles. There are 3 clay Masters titles atm, when was the last time a grass Masters title existed?

Nadal is a fighter. He's a Caroline Wozniacki. Take clay from the equation and he has 5 slams. Take grass or hard and Fed still has 10 or 7 respectively.

Plus, Montolivo's point is great. They've played far more times on clay than anywhere else. If a clay specialist and a grass/fast specialist play 20 times, 3 times on fast and 17 times on clay, and it's 17-3 in h2h, is that significant? Only that they're masters of their fields.

 

[Soldier_of_god]

I just gave an example with davydenko to show how H2h can be fucked up.

No, nadal is not the greatest. All statistics goes against you, cause nadal has nothing on federer when it COMES TO TITLES, you get that? Titles is what matters in the END. Who the fuck cares if Inter wins Milan both games this season but Milan wins the league? its the damn title that matters in the end.

Federer has been consistent on all surfaces, while nadal crashes out faster than Kubot outside FO. You know that Federer and nadal has never met in Us Open? Why is that? cause nadal is not consistent enough to get to meet federer. While federer has been in multiple FO finals and met nadal there. Also they have only met 3 times on grass, with federer having 2-1 in H2h there, also on carpets (wich has been removed) federer leads 2-0 there. So on fast courts federer has a winning record against nadal 4-1.

The h2h between them is misleading cause nadal has played against federer on his best surface 15 times, while federer has only met him three times on grass. And I recall, cause nadal sucks on grass and cant get past the first rounds.

Nadal will never be greater than fed. He is declining now and gets more and more injuries, wich can harm his personal life. Thats why we will see nadal less on the tour. He will never pass federer in terms of slams, or be greater. Nothing favours nadal in that.

uhmmm, as iirc, nadal does have a winning h2h over federer on his preferred surface you know. as in hardcourts. he has a winning record vs federer on hard courts. nadal has 2 us opens, he was the reigning us open champion this year, did u know that?? We will see about that. I am certain nadal will match federer or get to atleast 16 slams which should be enough for him to claim the GOAT title, simply cause he has a winning record vs federer on all fucking surfaces except grass. YEAHHHH, uhm nadal sucks on grass, yet he has 2 wimbledon titles wowwwwww. Nadal has more masters titles than federer and dont tell me masters doesnt matter lmao. Atleast nadal beat federer on an indoor fast hard court. Federer has never beaten nadal after 08 in slams. Pretty poor for a so called great player. Nadal would hands down be the GOAT if he wins roughly about 16 slams. In no other individual sport will you find a player who is supposedly the GOAT, actually having a losing record to his main rival. Do you understand what i mean when i say main/arch rival. You cannot be the greatest if you are not even the best in your own generation lmao. Thats some messed up shit dreamed up by fodder fodderer fans. Nadal annihilates any of his top 4 arch rivals, besides he has 14 slams, more than enough to put him in contention for the GOAT title. i am done.

 

[Soldier_of_god]

swagger, is nadal winning djokovic when it matters? hahaha.

Djokovic leads 12-10 in finals against nadal.

uhmmm i am pretty sure thats not the case in grand slams you know?? lawl. poor attempt brah.

 

[Soldier_of_god]

H2H means fuck all when your records ain't equal. Plus, you see the utter ridiculousness of H2H when Davydenko solidly beats him and Fed annihilates Davydenko but is bad against Nadal. It's a match-up and that's all. Fed's unfortunate in that his greatest rival is his worst possible match-up.

You go on and on about Nadal having more Masters titles but ignore Fed smashing him on YEC titles. There are 3 clay Masters titles atm, when was the last time a grass Masters title existed?

Nadal is a fighter. He's a Caroline Wozniacki. Take clay from the equation and he has 5 slams. Take grass or hard and Fed still has 10 or 7 respectively.

Plus, Montolivo's point is great. They've played far more times on clay than anywhere else. If a clay specialist and a grass/fast specialist play 20 times, 3 times on fast and 17 times on clay, and it's 17-3 in h2h, is that significant? Only that they're masters of their fields.

yeah except, nadal beat federer on his best surface aka grass. when did federer ever beat nadal at roland garros ??? why is that so hard to comprehend. Besides, i would gladly say federer is the GOAT had he beaten nadal more often on hard courts, but he lost in the aussie open twice i think and he does have a losing record against nadal on hardcourts overall. Conversely nadal completely annihilates him on any clay court.

 

[Soldier_of_god]

nadal has a winning h2h vs djokovic in the us open hahahahah. holy shit, this guy is a freak.

 

[Montolivo]

uhmmm, as iirc, nadal does have a winning h2h over federer on his preferred surface you know. as in hardcourts. he has a winning record vs federer on hard courts. nadal has 2 us opens, he was the reigning us open champion this year, did u know that?? We will see about that. I am certain nadal will match federer or get to atleast 16 slams which should be enough for him to claim the GOAT title, simply cause he has a winning record vs federer on all fucking surfaces except grass. YEAHHHH, uhm nadal sucks on grass, yet he has 2 wimbledon titles wowwwwww. Nadal has more masters titles than federer and dont tell me masters doesnt matter lmao. Atleast nadal beat federer on an indoor fast hard court. Federer has never beaten nadal after 08 in slams. Pretty poor for a so called great player. Nadal would hands down be the GOAT if he wins roughly about 16 slams. In no other individual sport will you find a player who is supposedly the GOAT, actually has a losing record to his main rival. Do you understand what i mean when i say main/arch rival. You cannot be the greatest if you are not even the best in your own generation lmao. Thats some messed up shit dreamed up by fodder fodderer fans. Nadal annihilates any of his top 4 arch rivals, hence, besides he has 14 slams, more than enough to put him in contention for the GOAT. i am done.

And you are missing the fact that Hard court since several years back has been slowed down drastically? experts are even comparing it to a clay court.

Comparing their h2h is unfair to roger, simple as that. Anyone would pick federers career over Nadals. Not because of the simple fact that Federer has the most important titles and records, but also the fact that Federer IS tennis, when people hear federer, they think of tennis. tennis would never be what it is today if it werent for roger. Also his playing style is special.

Nadal fans can only dream of nadal getting bigger than federer. Never in a zillion years will he be bigger than him, nabull can have 30 slams he would still be in the shadow of the great roger.

 

[Montolivo]

uhmmm i am pretty sure thats not the case in grand slams you know?? lawl. poor attempt brah.

Bad attempt?

what is so hard to comprehend with djokovic winning the majority of the finals they have met in? this includes all events, masters, 500 tournaments, grand slam. Not just one tournament.

 

[Soldier_of_god]

And you are missing the fact that Hard court since several years back has been slowed down drastically? experts are even comparing it to a clay court.

no proof. even federer himself admitted that the courts look the same as it was when he dominated.


Comparing their h2h is unfair to roger, simple as that. Anyone would pick federers career over Nadals. Not because of the simple fact that Federer has the most important titles and records, but also the fact that Federer IS tennis, when people hear federer, they think of tennis. tennis would never be what it is today if it werent for roger. Also his playing style is special.

Nadal's playing style is better to me. i like the physical game.


Nadal fans can only dream of nadal getting bigger than federer. Never in a zillion years will he be bigger than him, nabull can have 30 slams he would still be in the shadow of the great roger.

perhaps, in the eyes of federer fans yea maybe. other neutral fans would disagree.

 

[Soldier_of_god]

Bad attempt?

what is so hard to comprehend with djokovic winning the majority of the finals they have met in? this includes all events, masters, 500 tournaments, grand slam. Not just one tournament.

well no. In grands slams, nadal has a winning h2h 9 - 3 vs djoker. So what is your point ? nadal beats him when it matters in the most important tournament. Now that is a sign of a champion. he is 9 -2 vs federer haha in slams too. Federer and djoker should be happy that nadal is so injury prone. He would have slaughtered them more often if he wasnt injured just before the commencement of important tournaments like he has been over the years.

 

[Sognatore]

shut up swegger

 

[Soldier_of_god]

suck my phallus. calcio lol. u want calcio rumours ? go find it yourself and post it brah.

 

[Bunnee]

Fuck you and fuck your tennis

 

[Lord7God]

suck my phallus. calcio lol. u want calcio rumours ? go find it yourself and post it brah.

Only place for serious calcio now is the AS Roma boardroom...

 

[blaze]

Fuck you and fuck your tennis

 

[blaze]

http://forum.acmilan-online.com/showthread.php?t=10306

 

[necromancer]

kohli will end up destroying Sanga's records.

^nope. Kohli is trash. Most overrated cricketer in the world. Rahane and kumar are the actual quality players india has atm. India is like aus. Good at home but terrible away lol. But india is better at odis away though. We just cant handle any decent spinner . Losing against what is probably the weakest pak side in years is a disgrace.

Milan = bangladesh

Think of appropriate analogies when you can't decide between players.

For instance, Kohli is like Rafael Nadal. Sangakkara is like Roger Federer.

 

[Curupira]

http://forum.acmilan-online.com/showthread.php?t=10306

yes please

 

[Soldier_of_god]

we will be lucky if we sign suso in jan. Not that he is going to magically improve us anyway.

oh shut up u idiots. as if we are going to buy anyone. tennis >> fodder meelan's transfer options.

 

[blaze]

we will be lucky if we sign suso in jan. Not that he is going to magically improve us anyway.

oh shut u idiots. as if we are going to buy anyone. tennis >> fodder meelan's transfer options.

shut u idiot

 

[Mexes5]

Nadal? More like Nadull