D
Deleted member 35916
Guest
I agree. I consider Nadal the greatest based on having played against the other 2 at their greatest, while consistently having massive injury issues. Also considering him being best on the toughest surface to play edges him ahead for me. Imagine if two grand slams were on clay.
So if clay is the hardest and Nadal is the best because he has the most slams on the hardest surface to play on, how come he didn't do as well on the "easier" surfaces?