The Rumour Commode XVII: A Condor In A Sea Of Red!

[ACMILANMKD]

I would really like us to hijack Witsel from Rubentus in January.
As a statement, to the mofos.

 

[Tadej]

Griezzman lol...absolutely no chance.

 

[Sorriso Sempre]

right now i d love to bring someone like Kroos more than griezmann or any other attacker
if we have very strong midfield even Belotti and bacca would do more than well

 

[joyrider]

No Madrid players until 2018.

 

[vidarth]

been thinking about this for a while...

who do you guys think is better Griezman or Dybala...both similar players.

I cant choose between the two...

 

[ibelongtomilan]

been thinking about this for a while...

who do you guys think is better Griezman or Dybala...both similar players.

I cant choose between the two...

Griezmann is better right now, but i think hes close to his full potential, which Dybala is not.

 

[Sorriso Sempre]

No Madrid players until 2018.

who said that??

cause they have transfer ban doesnt mean that players dont want to leave at some point...happened with barca too

 

[Az.]

y tf they gonna sell Griezzmann if they cant buy anyone replace, nonsense

we actually cant get anyone from AM, maybe we can get someone from RM, coz they have tons of MFs

Yeah because teams never sell players if either:

• A release clause is met.
• Teams that wants to buy throws enough money at them.
• Player forces the move.

Things like that never happen in football.

P.S: Might wanna face palm yourself harder, maybe get some common sense, or maybe learn that semantics matter.

 

[Mario]

Griezmann I think is very unlikely. We'd need to be back in UCL and have at least 2 good season to prove that were serious & Milan's back
He'd also cost at least 90m and I'm quite happy with our attack. Obviously when you've got so much money you can always do better but I'd want at least 2 CMs, an AM/winger & a CB before a striker

I think we can sign top players but mainly the ones who are unsettled or buy from the Portuguese league
I'm thinking of names like James, Cesc, Arda, Yaya etc. I can see us signing one or two

 

[theduck7]

I think people need to calm down regarding Maldini's comments, he must get asked that question on a daily basis so of course he'll be pissed, he maybe also hasn't been approached yet. I think if he says no then maybe that's a sign either Galliani is staying or these buyers aren't legit but we shall see

 

[Jasper]

ive only seen him play in the last euros...and he looked like trash idk

He was gassed. Interesting dude, though haven't watched Premier League. Don't think 50m will do with Levy/Tottenham. Don't believe the rumour is to be taken seriously.

Since inspiring a late 2-1 victory over Aston Villa in November 2014, Kane has started each of the subsequent 69 Premier League games. He has been available for selection for 123 combined Tottenham, England and England U21s games since; he has missed just eight. No other England player has played more than 100 games in that time.
Kane has played 6,120 minutes of Premier League football out of a possible 6,210 since that November 2014 victory. The closest striker to reaching that total is Romelu Lukaku; he has played 697 fewer minutes. Jamie Vardy is next, and he has featured for 922 fewer minutes.

http://www.football365.com/news/tactics-pressure-maybe-harry-is-just-kaned

 

[ibelongtomilan]

Yeah because teams never sell players if either:

• A release clause is met.
• Teams that wants to buy throws enough money at them.
• Player forces the move.

Things like that never happen in football.

P.S: Might wanna face palm yourself harder, maybe get some common sense, or maybe learn that semantics matter.

please thinking a bit b4 u write sth

1. He just extended his contract until 2021. Release clause of him is 100M, we r gonna REBUILD our squad, not throwing 100M for only 1 guy and still have Monto as CDM.

2. How much money is enough to convince AM, as i said AM cant buy another guy for 1 year, so they will never accept a bid for him.

3. AM is a better club right now, and hes a key player for them. Either he stays or he leaves, his destination isnt here. Hes a proven star. Y should he chose us, MU Chels, Real or whatever are still w8ing like hell for his signature.

We might only get him after 2 more years, when AM falls down or he wanna get new challenge. And we hopefully have a much better squads.

But right now? Keep ur dreaming about Griezmann, its like we r going to buy Messi, sry but i prefer the reality.

 

[Romagnely]

please thinking a bit b4 u write sth

1. He just extended his contract until 2021. Release clause of him is 100M, we r gonna REBUILD our squad, not throwing 100M for only 1 guy and still have Monto as CDM.

2. How much money is enough to convince AM, as i said AM cant buy another guy for 1 year, so they will never accept a bid for him.

3. AM is a better club right now, and hes a key player for them. Either he stays or he leaves, his destination isnt here. Hes a proven star. Y should he chose us, MU Chels, Real or whatever are still w8ing like hell for his signature.

We might only get him after 2 more years, when AM falls down or he wanna get new challenge. And we hopefully have a much better squads.

But right now? Keep ur dreaming about Griezmann, its like we r going to buy Messi, sry but i prefer the reality.

Griezmann is impossible unless he is a rossonero. Which i dont think he is.

 

[Congo Powers]

He was gassed. Interesting dude, though haven't watched Premier League. Don't think 50m will do with Levy/Tottenham. Don't believe the rumour is to be taken seriously.

Since inspiring a late 2-1 victory over Aston Villa in November 2014, Kane has started each of the subsequent 69 Premier League games. He has been available for selection for 123 combined Tottenham, England and England U21s games since; he has missed just eight. No other England player has played more than 100 games in that time.
Kane has played 6,120 minutes of Premier League football out of a possible 6,210 since that November 2014 victory. The closest striker to reaching that total is Romelu Lukaku; he has played 697 fewer minutes. Jamie Vardy is next, and he has featured for 922 fewer minutes.

http://www.football365.com/news/tactics-pressure-maybe-harry-is-just-kaned

hm interesting
does china like epl..would that be the reason why they want to sign goofy english guy

 

[ibelongtomilan]

Harry kane is decent, but he will cost more than 50M, coz England Clubs would prefer to keep their HG players, who are rare in PL, so they are unlikely want to sell him. Thats y Eng players are always overprice. Its like Pogba, MU needs HG players , and Pogba is WC. Both are ideal for them, so they broke transfer record for him.

There are more WC strikers, we dont need Harry Kane. Anw i actually dont rate Eng players high.

 

[jammin]

He was gassed. Interesting dude, though haven't watched Premier League. Don't think 50m will do with Levy/Tottenham. Don't believe the rumour is to be taken seriously.

Since inspiring a late 2-1 victory over Aston Villa in November 2014, Kane has started each of the subsequent 69 Premier League games. He has been available for selection for 123 combined Tottenham, England and England U21s games since; he has missed just eight. No other England player has played more than 100 games in that time.
Kane has played 6,120 minutes of Premier League football out of a possible 6,210 since that November 2014 victory. The closest striker to reaching that total is Romelu Lukaku; he has played 697 fewer minutes. Jamie Vardy is next, and he has featured for 922 fewer minutes.

http://www.football365.com/news/tactics-pressure-maybe-harry-is-just-kaned

He hasn't scored during August in 10 matches now.

Obvious deadline day signing

 

[Neo'82]

Griezmann will go to the EPL in time. We've no chance of getting any current top players. We need to unearth future gems. It's essential that the new management team are WC.

Kane is a bizarre rumour. Not a player we should be interested in.

 

[Congo Powers]

yea im of the opinion that english players are absolute trash

 

[Kasoka]

Everyone who seriously believes there is even just a small chance of us signing a player like Griezmann or even Kane (who costs >60m because the EPL is nuts), will be severely disappointed. Not just because we won't get them, but because the overall expectations of what we will be able to pull of under new ownership doesn't match reality.

FFP still exists. There are tricks to partially circumvent it and increase your spending power as well as the possibility to negotiate a good deal with UEFA that gives you some freedom, but nonetheless the days were you just could spend 200m-250m more than you have are over. We will spend more money than in the past, but we won't be the next PSG or City.

 

[Neruda]

 

[Az.]

please thinking a bit b4 u write sth

1. He just extended his contract until 2021. Release clause of him is 100M, we r gonna REBUILD our squad, not throwing 100M for only 1 guy and still have Monto as CDM.

2. How much money is enough to convince AM, as i said AM cant buy another guy for 1 year, so they will never accept a bid for him.

3. AM is a better club right now, and hes a key player for them. Either he stays or he leaves, his destination isnt here. Hes a proven star. Y should he chose us, MU Chels, Real or whatever are still w8ing like hell for his signature.

We might only get him after 2 more years, when AM falls down or he wanna get new challenge. And we hopefully have a much better squads.

But right now? Keep ur dreaming about Griezmann, its like we r going to buy Messi, sry but i prefer the reality.

Do you not understand English or something?

In my first post when i replied to you i explicitly told you that the ban only applies to buying, not selling because you said they are banned.

In the same post is said that it doesn't matter anyway, as we won't get him. Stop assuming things about:

- How much money will we have, wait until the Chinese actually take over before making plans.
- His release clause isn't even outrageous, going by what players go in todays market.

 

[joyrider]

who said that??

cause they have transfer ban doesnt mean that players dont want to leave at some point...happened with barca too

Really, i thought that no player can leave or go to these clubs with a transfer ban.

What happened to Barca?

Good to know, it's possible!

 

[Kaka06/07]

We cant sign world class players nor should we try, too much financial resource into one player can cause disharmony. Even when we are ready i would prefer us to sign players on the cusp of being world class. Players who cost 25-45 mill. Luke griezmann when he went to athletico or sanchez when he moved to barca or dayabala when he moved to juve. Sign them just before they become/ start becoming world class. Its up to the scouts and sporting director to pick the right players. Thats going to be the diffrence to us returing where we belong. No us speanding 100 mill on superstars, not sustainable.

 

[ibelongtomilan]

Do you not understand English or something?

In my first post when i replied to you i explicitly told you that the ban only applies to buying, not selling because you said they are banned.

In the same post is said that it doesn't matter anyway, as we won't get him. Stop assuming things about:

- How much money will we have, wait until the Chinese actually take over before making plans.
- His release clause isn't even outrageous, going by what players go in todays market.

I understood the rules. I already knew they can sell people years ago.

But as i said they got banned from transfer market -> they cant buy new talents -> they wont sell anyone, especially their key player.

And then u threw like 3 reasons to show how we get him, which are all impossible. So i want to explain a bit.

Thats all. Dont wanna discuss about this anymore. W/e i didnt write a full sentence in my first post, might cause misleading.

 

[beegees]

so who will be in charge for winter mercato? fassone?

 

[Mr Delicious]

so who will be in charge for winter mercato? fassone?

All, to my knowledge, Fassone will do is hire the necessary people and handle funds. The new SD will be the ones picking out names and actually buying players

 

[Berlusconi]

Thoughts on harry kane? Espn reporting it as well

50Mil to get the same output as Bacca. therefore no thanks

 

[Berlusconi]

yea im of the opinion that english players are absolute trash

Same here, don't remember the last time an English player did well outside EPL besides Beckham and Owen for 1 season as a super sub

 

[Berlusconi]

We cant sign world class players nor should we try, too much financial resource into one player can cause disharmony. Even when we are ready i would prefer us to sign players on the cusp of being world class. Players who cost 25-45 mill. Luke griezmann when he went to athletico or sanchez when he moved to barca or dayabala when he moved to juve. Sign them just before they become/ start becoming world class. Its up to the scouts and sporting director to pick the right players. Thats going to be the diffrence to us returing where we belong. No us speanding 100 mill on superstars, not sustainable.

 

[Il Capitano_3]

it's a shame that we were linked to both, griezmann and dybala, when they played at Sociedad and Palermo