They played good football with him, that is true, but Pirlo is the coach that ended Juve's 9 year scudetto streak. They were the favourite to win again alongside with Conte's merda, but they exited the scudetto race pretty early, by October-November I believe. At that time, they still had a really strong squad.
Maybe didn’t go to Saudi due to loyalty to Qatar which rigged him a World Cup![]()
I can't wait to see the synergy between Pioli and Moncada.Moncada met with Enzo in Argentina and wined and dined him into delaying his decision for a Milan offer
This was as a scout and not a director
I think it'll be OK
I can't wait to see the synergy between Pioli and Moncada.
With this new approach to the players we are saving money from plane tickets,dinners,hookers booze and everything
After all we have to fund our mercato
The narrative that Maldini failed is funny. Yes, we finished 5th in the standings but we finished 4th in the Champions League. Failure in this instance is a purely subjective measure that RedBird is using to justify a decision they were going to make anyway.
Hedge funds and private equity are always going to put their people in place, they want to put as many guarantees as possible on the playing field.
Should we be putting our faith in a manager who needs to be put into that position in order to play the right players?tbf, if we only have youth, pioli won't have a choice.
Less mercenaries = more zaniolosLess mercenaries = better football
Impossible for elliott or Gerry to fire Maldini after the scudetto. Reaction would have been far far worsehonest question.... knowing what we know now, would have preferred that elliott canned him last summer after he got wildly vocal, or have it happen as it did?
Moncada said he doesnt like the brazilians so they are of the table,we are going French at the full forceHookers can be pretty convincing!! The Brazilian players might not want to come to Milan!
I respect your opinion, and agree with a lot of this, I just don't get how Pioli is less culpable than Maldini for last season.I think the people here pushing for this narrative are being extremely harsh. It’s just about power and decision making. They couldn’t and wouldn’t fire Maldini when they bought the club directly after a scudetto run, there would have been riots. He used that leverage to get what he wanted, more power and decision making. Not having to go through a gazidis type.
And while I’m of the opinion that last summer wasn’t good and it’s more on management for team regression rather than Pioli, I don’t like the guys here saying like “oh of course Maldini got fired for last summer.” This issue with this thinking is that every club/director has bad windows, especially when you operate the way we do. Not every young player will hit it off here. So while Maldini Massara contributed to the team being worse off this season, they still reached their minimum objective and I fully was confident they’re get things back on track in 2023 summer.
So that’s the issue I have with the he failed get fired crew here. It’s not “cutthroat” to fire someone on the basis of a few mistakes when the whole of their body of work was very impressive. It’s reactive, impatient and stupid. The reality is Gerry didn’t want Maldini to have that much power. Still I’m not in full panic mode like some because I think Moncada getting more say isn’t a bad thing. And I think Pioli being consulted more makes sense. I think they highly highly value Moncada and it seems like Maldini may have said no to him on some things.
You know one would think you would be more grateful to our new lord and savior Gerry for sparing you from watching Zaniolo and/or Berardi in this team next seasonI can't wait to see the synergy between Pioli and Moncada.
I think the argument is that a cook can only cook with the ingredients that the restaurant can provide him with.I respect your opinion, and agree with a lot of this, I just don't get how Pioli is less culpable than Maldini for last season.
I respect your opinion, and agree with a lot of this, I just don't get how Pioli is less culpable than Maldini for last season.
Don't worry bro....many times Milan was just reduced to the red and black colours.Status day after: It feels like a part of me have been killed and that I will never be happy again.

did so well as a manager that he got fired in turkeyDidn't Pirlo do a pretty decent job at Juve? They started out not that great, but by the end of the season they were playing some good football. Are people mixing their feelings about Pirlo the person with Pirlo the coach?
I can't wait to see what incredible RW talent Moncada brings in. I refuse to believe that Maldini would have gotten either of those players.You know one would think you would be more grateful to our new lord and savior Gerry for sparing you from watching Zaniolo and/or Berardi in this team next season
I think the argument is that a cook can only cook with the ingredients that the restaurant can provide him with.
If the food comes out poorly because of the cooking, then it's on him. If the restaurant gets a poor review because the "ingredients" weren't "fresh" enough, then it's on the procurement manager (regardless of how much money the owner gave him to use).
Pioli could well be just as incompetent and in the wrong, but from all the KPIs, it seems the measurable issues mostly lie with Maldini at the moment.
Yeah, but Brutus was like a son to Caesar besides being his mother's lover. In the civil war Brutus allied with Pompeus against his mentor and was captured, Caesar forgave him and welcomed in his inner circle. I think the dictator for life thing was an honorary title but among the fierce republicans Cato was the most passionate and Cicero supported the faction.Ceaser was great and a genius but declaring himself 'dictator for life', when he really didn't need to totally sealed his death.
It's also ironic that out of the so called liberators only Brutus was genuine at heart about serving the republic, the rest of the assasinators were self-serving oligarchs who had personal motives for the betrayal of Ceasar.
Things haven't really changed 2000 years later in the modern world, people's predatory behavioral patterns are pretty much the same in politics and buisness.
I understand that argument, but I think it requires that one waive away horrific performances by Pioli and excuse him for things that are entirely within his control.I think the argument is that a cook can only cook with the ingredients that the restaurant can provide him with.
If the food comes out poorly because of the cooking, then it's on him. If the restaurant gets a poor review because the "ingredients" weren't "fresh" enough, then it's on the procurement manager (regardless of how much money the owner gave him to use).
Pioli could well be just as incompetent and in the wrong, but from all the KPIs, it seems the measurable issues mostly lie with Maldini at the moment.
Sam I know you’re going to die on this hill against me regarding Pioli’s use of the team but I think you’re not giving any flexibility toward any room for the idea. I hate to do this to you bro but you sound VERY similar to the crowd who cried and cried about how Pioli was killing Hauge. Look how that one ended up. So for the sake of the argument bear with me and try to play devils advocate against yourself.Should we be putting our faith in a manager who needs to be put into that position in order to play the right players?