ROSSONERI7
Myself
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2004
- Messages
- 11,300
- Reaction score
- 39,025
Florenzi during that whole Tonali betting saga:

Calabria is next, right?
Last edited:
pioliFlorenzi during that whole Tonali betting saga.
![]()
Calabria is next, right?
Can he set up Pioli too? Somebody steal Pioli’s cell and place a bet on Milan to lose so he can get sacked with no severance.Gerry preparing ground to terminate contract and free up wages![]()
He train with Stalmach, I'm worried.
At 2026 our forum will be moved again and your post would be vanish without a trace, so anyone who want to prove a point better screenshot this one (not me).Haven’t I always said 2026?
Boateng saying De Zerbi will be the no.1 coach in the world in the next 20 years.
P. S.
RLC DID NOT TRAIN WITH THE TEAM TODAY. After being "tired" vs Lecce, obviously he's not well now. The things our staff does it beyond incredibly shit. No serious club would allow itself what's currently happening in Milan.
I can’t believe, it’s been 4 years.
I’ve waited for this since 2020.
And it failed miserably.I don’t want Conte at all but tbf he’s played with wingers in Spurs and used 3-4-3.
This is further than we got with the old project at San Siro right? So all that’s remaining is the feasibility study? Or are there more government processes we need to go throughThe petition against the stadium has been rejected by an overwhelming majority
And it failed miserably.
The council will vote on the variant proposed by Sportlifecity if that is approved we are almost thereThis is further than we got with the old project at San Siro right? So all that’s remaining is the feasibility study? Or are there more government processes we need to go through
We bought Sportlifecity, which already had a project fully approved and had all the permits and were ready to build. We are now asking the council to change the design to make a bigger stadium. The rules allow for a certain percentage of your project area to be built up, lets say you can only build on 120% of your land, volumetrically. That for SLC was a certain number that allowed for buildings and a stadium for 20,000. We want more, so what we did was we bought more land surrounding the SLC plot. That allows us to keep the same 120% percentage, but increase the total volume. What's happening now is that we are asking for approval to do this, and to show all the repercussions because of the increase in load (people and services) and how it affects the transport network. This has all been approved previously, we're just amending. It's not a feasibility study or anything like that. We have the permit ready to go for the original 20k stadium and old design of the project, and this makes it a LOT easier to move forward. Once they approve the variant to the design, which is supposed to happen in a few months, then we are all good to go. We will start the actual designing of the project and do all the design integrations with the road networks and figure out policing and get the final ok from the council. At this point we will start spending a LOT of money, which means we would have had legal guarantees that everything is good to go.This is further than we got with the old project at San Siro right? So all that’s remaining is the feasibility study? Or are there more government processes we need to go through
His style of football is not suited for teams that want to dominate a league.I dont need a coach that reinvents football just a sensible one that's capable of picking what's best for the team no matter the context
what bothers me the most is that i felt and still feel to some extent that pioli could be that guy but he just can't get over his stubborn ways. just when you think he does and makes slight changes he immediately reverts to what didnt work once the team picks up some momentum
Am I the only one who finds it odd that Isma got “injured” in May when the weather was getting much too hot for his beloved leggings and that he’s returning now just in time for leggings season?
gerry doesn't want to dominate the leagueHis style of football is not suited for teams that want to dominate a league.
ChatGPT actually will do this lol.Can we enter this into brkGPT to get a TLDR?
Sure, but I'd argue for a 3-4-3 to work you really need more true DMs to lock things down centrally and balance out the overloaded wingplay. He had Kante and Matic. We have Pobega and Krunic. I would say we definitely have the CBs to run 3 ATB, and Theo would be great as a wingback. But yeah the CMs not so much.Okay and with Chelsea in 2016-17 when they won the league? Conte used 3-4-3, playing Hazard on the wings and he did really well, didn’t he?
Thanks a lot. Very helpful explanation.We bought Sportlifecity, which already had a project fully approved and had all the permits and were ready to build. We are now asking the council to change the design to make a bigger stadium. The rules allow for a certain percentage of your project area to be built up, lets say you can only build on 120% of your land, volumetrically. That for SLC was a certain number that allowed for buildings and a stadium for 20,000. We want more, so what we did was we bought more land surrounding the SLC plot. That allows us to keep the same 120% percentage, but increase the total volume. What's happening now is that we are asking for approval to do this, and to show all the repercussions because of the increase in load (people and services) and how it affects the transport network. This has all been approved previously, we're just amending. It's not a feasibility study or anything like that. We have the permit ready to go for the original 20k stadium and old design of the project, and this makes it a LOT easier to move forward. Once they approve the variant to the design, which is supposed to happen in a few months, then we are all good to go. We will start the actual designing of the project and do all the design integrations with the road networks and figure out policing and get the final ok from the council. At this point we will start spending a LOT of money, which means we would have had legal guarantees that everything is good to go.
So basically the only road block left is for the council to approve the variant soon. After that happens, we move forward as if we were SLC going ahead with their amended project.
This looks like a copy paste of our situationOf fucking course
As reported in today's edition of Il Corriere-Milano. after about eight months from the meeting between the owner of Milan, Gerry Cardinale, and the president of the Lombardy Region Attilio Fontana, this time Alessandro Antonello, CEO of Inter, showed up in the governor's offices and presented the stadium project that the Nerazzurri want to achieve in Rozzano in the Cabassi area.
There are no official statements, but the president would have been positively impressed both by the progress of the project and by the lower complexity of the administrative challenges to be faced compared to other project choices. For now it was a simple exchange of institutional courtesies, but the opening of a technical table is expected in the near future.
At the moment, in fact, everything is still in the hands of the Municipality of Rozzano. In Viale della Liberazione, however, they want to proceed quickly to make up for the time lost with the project in cohabitation with Milan which concerned the San Siro area, with the new stadium which should have been built next to the current one which would have been demolished. Returning to Rozzano, the Nerazzurri club intends to build its new stadium, this time independently, in an area owned by Infrafin, the company belongs to the Cabassi group, at the Milan West barrier on the Milan-Genoa motorway on the border with Assago.
Last October the Municipality of Rozzano approved the variant to the local government plan, including the provision of the new stadium with some details which are already known. The capacity will be 70 thousand seats and the project will be created by Studio Internazionale Populous, the same one that presented one of the projects for the new San Siro. The idea is to place the club's new headquarters alongside the stadium and a space dedicated exclusively to the youth sector. The stadium must be "accessible, usable, technological, which fits into the environmental context because the area on which it will be located is urban agricultural".
In addition to the new modern, multifunctional and sustainable facility, there will be a sports Citadel, catering areas, shops and services for fans, visitors and citizens, but also an Innovation Hub, a medical centre, a park and a museum. All open and accessible 365 days a year to anyone who wants to attend, regardless of the matches.
The times would seem very short if compared to those of the San Siro affair, also because a dialogue is already underway between the club and the administration on some of the main issues for the construction of the stadium, primarily the road network and the parking issue, which they will mostly be buried. As soon as the variant is published, Inter will be able to proceed with the acquisition of the area already optioned until 30 April 2024. Also by April, the Nerazzurri intend to present the project - for which it is not yet possible to predict a cost overall — so as to obtain authorization to start work within a year and a half. The inaugural match is therefore expected for the 2028/29 season. In this regard, the CEO Antonello had declared in recent weeks: «The Rozzano project is currently demonstrating certainty in timing and also ease of execution».