100% would cost 10m, which they don't have30% resale to universidad de Chile for osorio is further evidence that Maldini is incompetent and is incapable of negotiating.
that's why they agree on 5m for 70%
100% would cost 10m, which they don't have30% resale to universidad de Chile for osorio is further evidence that Maldini is incompetent and is incapable of negotiating.
We are playing like Batman at the start of The Dark Knight Rises. We lack that edge.100% fair. My criticism for Pioli is always that we still play very predictably and the recent abandonment of discipline.
Once again, Napoli is able to do this because they are cushioned by selling their big players for respectable amounts.
I have fought tooth and nail to defend maldino from the accusations of "bad at selling" but if we lose out on Leao, there is no excuses.
Massara30% resale to universidad de Chile for osorio is further evidence that Maldini is incompetent and is incapable of negotiating.
lol
is it really Vasquez?
That's for rainy day funds in case of missing CL, we don't HAVE to sell key players at losses in order to even have 50m mercati.Yeah sure they could have sold Kessie before he entered the last season. That was a mistake.
But what about all the money from cutting squad costs and lowering the overall salary? Shouldn't the management be allowed to spend that?
I mean if they renew Hakan on 5m, Kessie on 6 mil, Romagnoli on 4 mil, Donnarumma on 8 mil, then management would be able to spend their small transfer budget on other needed positions like a right winger, better FB, but the squad cost would be much higher!
When people see how much owners are letting the management spend they don't bother to look at how much the management has cut in overall costs!!
Let's be honest, once again, nobody has a clue.Massara
It’s just poor business. They claim they are trying to achieve sustainability yet make deals like this. When we try to sell him (if we do), we would lose so much in income from his sale.100% would cost 10m, which they don't have
that's why they agree on 5m for 70%
Moving out Romagnoli and Kessie should have freed up funds to spend more, and Ibra going from 7m to 1m also must have helped. Moving on from Donna and replacing him with Maignan, saved us money.Yeah sure they could have sold Kessie before he entered the last season. That was a mistake.
But what about all the money from cutting squad costs and lowering the overall salary? Shouldn't the management be allowed to spend that?
I mean if they renew Hakan on 5m, Kessie on 6 mil, Romagnoli on 4 mil, Donnarumma on 8 mil, then management would be able to spend their small transfer budget on other needed positions like a right winger, better FB, but the squad cost would be much higher!
When people see how much owners are letting the management spend they don't bother to look at how much the management has cut in overall costs!!
We dont blame Paolo! We pass that onto others.Let's be honest, once again, nobody has a clue.
We were all slagging off Braida calling him a lazy incompetent sycophant until he left and joined Barcelona and then everyone in here was calling him the brains behind the operation.
Even if Pioli turns it around, and wins the fucking CL and Serie A this year, if he doesn't change the fitness staff, I'm going to shout out diatribes that will make Dennis Reynolds seem calm.Bennacer out now. Pioli is truly incompetent and should be out simply due to our injury record.
Wait until you see Tata warming up.yeah that’s clearly a 350k gk
That's for rainy day funds in case of missing CL, we don't HAVE to sell key players at losses in order to even have 50m mercati.
If things keep going the way they are, we might see this happen this season![]()
If those 30% got us 5m discount up to a sale of 20-25m that actually makes us money or is neutral.It’s just poor business. They claim they are trying to achieve sustainability yet make deals like this. When we try to sell him (if we do), we would lose so much in income from his sale.
30% resale to universidad de Chile for osorio is further evidence that Maldini is incompetent and is incapable of negotiating.
Hope it all works out. I’m scared though.If those 30% got us 5m discount up to a sale of 20-25m that actually makes us money or is neutral.
If he flops and we sell him for 5m than saving those 5m is huge, if he is a reasonable success and we sell him for 20m you need to pay them 6m but saved 5m before and had them to work with all that time. If you never sell him it is also a win, my local club had a resale stake in Alaba - never happend.
If we sell him for 50m it still only makes 10m difference, bad but not extreme either. 30% for a proper discount is not a bad deal, especially if not a selling club.
Went home and trained excessively in order to not be blamed for the Inter game?Vitiello: Bennacer muscle problem in the left hamstring. The exams will be repeated in the next few days to better understand the entity.
I'm not that familiar with Napoli's financial state, but ADL has pushed them from the lower leagues when he took them over in 2004 when they were bankrupt, and it took a very long time to get them where they are now.What's the rainy day for Roma and Napoli who have higher squad costs than Milan? And they also have lower revenues than Milan.
Inter had almost the same net spend in the summer, have a much higher salary, and according to some people here they are supposed to be broke!
People just look at transfer spend but not on the salary spend. If you can give 8-10 mil net salaries to players then you can just to do a bunch of free transfers and spend very little. But then your overall costs will be higher!
Especially with the rumors of playing him in the middle of a 3 man midfieldWent home and trained excessively in order to not be blamed for the Inter game?
Listen, if Roma is in a good place financially, they wouldn't be in this whole shit show with Zaniolo (not being able to sell him unless its obligation due to FFP)What's the rainy day for Roma and Napoli who have higher squad costs than Milan? And they also have lower revenues than Milan.
Inter had almost the same net spend in the summer, have a much higher salary, and according to some people here they are supposed to be broke!
People just look at transfer spend but not on the salary spend. If you can give 8-10 mil net salaries to players then you can just to do a bunch of free transfers and spend very little. But then your overall costs will be higher!