I dunno ... I'll see. I've got some stuff to do ... been a busy week. If I didn't waste an entire day on this thread

, I surely would have watched. We'll see ...
I would also agree with this ... but bringing in a #10 would more or less take up a fourth spot in midfield, than three - which is how we currently lineup. If anything, if we were to bring in a #10, he would come in to replace either one of our (currently) three forwards, or Clarence, who plays like one anyway. Therefore, a #10 coming in doesn't really affect Pirlo as much as at seems.
The fact of the matter is that Pirlo does no longer require a protector, IMO. His defensive game has improved A LOT, and last season, he basically played as a holding midfielder or central midfielder. I thought he did very well, having some exceptional games, and maybe 1-2 bad ones - acceptable. Other than that, he was consistent throughout the season.
In addition, he played well in most of our big games last season - Real Madrid, he was miles ahead of both Alonso and Diarra combined; United, even though he had Park man-marking him, he was probably our best player when he had something to play for ... MERDA, Roma, again he put out solid performances.
So, even though he started his career as a CAM, he's now a complete CM IMO. I don't think you can say Xavi, for example, is better defensively - or Lampard for that matter. I actually think Pirlo's positional awareness in closing spaces and passing channels is better than those two. Only problem is ... and this is his biggest drawback ... is that he doesn't move into advanced position often enough.
Whether he does this out of reaching his (ability) limit or whether it is a tactical plan, I'm really not sure. It doesn't help matters when everyone pushes forward leaving very little cover for whats remaining of the defense ... I mean, Ambro/Flamini/Gattuso even push forward; Clarence pretty much plays as far up as a forward; wingbacks ... awfully imbalanced - something you can't say of both Chelsea and Bartha, or any other top team.
Reason being, they have more dynamic players. If you're still following me, that means players like Malouda don't just stand in one position of the field. If you look at Chelsea, they had Ballack - Lampard - Mikel in midfield, with Mikel HARDLY getting into attacking positions. And while Lampard pushed forward more, Ballack was a little more cautious when leaving the midfield - not to mention Anelka, Malouda, Kalou, etc. being actively involved in buildups, with all three of the constantly moving to create options for players to pass to.
The same can be said of Bartha ... heck even MERDA - albeit their work rate being miles ahead of any other team. I mean, they coped with Zannetti in MF FFS ... shows you how hard their forwards WORK.
So contrary to common belief, Pirlo isn't a problem at Milan. He isn't a priority that should be addressed. He needs a competitor - that I agree - a prospect challenging him + keeping him on his toes; not to mention, being an avid student

But sort out the fullbacks, box-to-box CM, maybe a winger/trequartista depending on the formation we want to play, cover for Nesta, GK, etc. first.
Shows you how much you know about football.
Club football and international football are completely different beasts. Someone could tear shit up at club level yet flop on the international scene and vice versa.
Bookmarked