22 is no where near prime for a defender. It’s much later. But nesta was fast at the time. Nesta was still world class but no where near his best at the time.
I just can’t put r9 above lot of the players because he lacked overall achievements at club level. He was a beast at his best but injuries had a huge impact on his career. Cant rate him as the best ever for what his potential might have been. In goat convos results and achievement matters too.
Ronaldinho faced a much stronger version of a Milan side and looked effortless when he want past our whole defense.
Probably at r9’s best he was untouchable but his peak never lasted long and at club level there is no achievements to speak of.
The modern idea that defenders peaks is in the 30s is weird to me. Nesta prime to me is somewhere from age 20 to early 30s.
He was in his prime when he faced Ronaldo. Lazio was also a team of similar quality or maybe better than Inter in the years of 1995-1998.
It's not like Nesta was an inexperienced youngster, he was starter for Lazio for years back then and he was considered World Class already and even for Lazio somebody of Nesta's age couldn't just waltz in there and be a starter back then.
In his first ever CL campaign in 1998/99 Ronaldo missed almost half of Serie A games for Inter due to recurring injuries. He also missed first leg Quarter Finals vs Man Utd in which Inter lost 2-0 to Man Utd. In the return leg 2 weeks later he was still not fit and had to be subbed out before the hour mark.
This was all before his 2 big knee injuries the 1999/2000 season.
Ronaldinho 2003-2006 is quite overestimated due to how entertaining of a player he was.
People just remember the highlights but not the facts.
In 2003-04 Ronaldinho was 23, he jobbed the La Liga title to Valencia and he couldn't even win UEFA Cup(something Ronaldo had accomplished at the age of 21 with an inferior team and when the UEFA Cup was still considered somewhat relevant), he also didn't win Copa del Rey which Ronaldo had won at age 20.
Of all the people you could use who have more career achivements than Ronaldo picking Ronaldinho is a weird one because Ronaldinho's achivements are not that great, and when you consider that his CL Title came with a * they become even more underwhelming. Even compared to Ronaldo who was unlucky with injuries Dinho's achievements feel more unimpressive.
Ronaldo wherever he went he won something(apart from Milan where he got his 3rd major injury after like 20 games), even at PSV he won a cup at least and even at PSV he missed half of the 2nd season injured and could have maybe won a league or even UEFA Cup.
Ronaldinho at age 21-23 went trophyless at PSG for 2 seasons. Ronaldo otoh to whatever club he went he won at least one trophy prior to reaching 30.
To me it seems like the CL performances of Dinho at Barca are making you overrate him. But if we're going that way then Ronaldo's performances for Brazil in 1998 and 2002 WC dwarf anything Dinho did at Barca. This is not mentioning Copa America 1997 and 1999 back when Copa America was a respectable competition btw.
Roaldinho otoh? He gave Mexico its 1st ever Confederation Cup trophy in 1999 by losing the final to the same Mexico team who was tired from competing in the Copa America 1999 a month earlier whereas Brazil played their B team which were fresh and was still really strong(Serginho, Flavio Conceicao, Ze Roberto, Emerson, Dida played for that team) and should have beaten Mexico but Ronaldinho didn't show up so they lost.
BTW having said all that: Back in the day nobody gave a fuck about how many trophies Ronaldo or Ronaldinho won. Especially the latter. People loved Ronaldinho for his entertaining playstyle, nobody was mentioning that he won Champions League or anything like that. Nobody gave a fuck.
Even in 2006 WC, I remember people being disappointed in Ronaldinho not because he lost but because he was such a no-show and people were expecting more entertainment from that Brazil in general but Brazil vastly underperformed Ronaldinho included. That's why it was a disappointment, not because they lost to France or whatever.
Same with Ronaldo, yes the world was rooting for him in 1998 and he got a seizure/poisoed by French FA in the final but nobody was obsessed with him winning it. Nobody was talking about ''muh goat'' back then either. It was such a better time honestly.