Haha yeah, pirlo is better tha xavi + fab combined and ambro is better than lass,
xabi, flams, essien............criticizing these players is pure blasphemy these days
Want to change your stance on this comment now?
It annoys me when Pool fans constantly hail Dirt Kuyt as the ' Dutch Master'. Seedorf is the real deal, a champion and is the true Dutch Master of the 20th Century.
Kuyt? LOL ... the Neanderthal isn't even worthy of reading the "Clarence Seedorf Facts"
Honestly ... Clarence is a living tribute to Dutch football. 4 UCLs worth of tribute!
How did you come to the conclusion that Ronaldinho wasn't motivated? I think he looked pretty motivated out there, but his physical ability let him down. As for Seedorf, nobody ever said he's talented as hell but he's liability because plays one good game out of 5-6. Madrid was just one game albeit a great one, but the way I see it Seedorf is very responsible for the poor league form because he doesn't turn the class on on a consistent basis. He needs to connect the lines of midfield and attack and usually he fails in doing that.
1. For starters, Dinho throwing his hands up in the air, complaining to the ref every single time he was cleanly dispossessed ... not even bothered to at least try and win the ball back or cover for players out of position expecting a pass from him.
2. Clarence is talented as hell. His touch and control this season have put Dinho's to shame.
3. Both Dinho and Clarence have been equally inconsistent. Difference is, when Clarence isn't producing much offensively, he is still providing cover, closing down spaces + working hard. Dinho does this for about 5 minutes in an entire match, and thinks of it as not his job

Did you see how Bori was working his ass off after coming on?
4. Wrong. First, what do you think is Dinho's role? Is he an attacker or a midfielder? If an attacker, he has been getting the ball to his feet ... that means Clarence is doing his job, but Dinho and the rest of the attack are fucking up. If a midfielder, then he should also be working like Clarence does ... i.e., cover spaces + giving us defensive balance.
He'd also be angry if an orangutan with no formal education and unstable finances impregnated his daughter, then formed a football club which went on to replace Inter as Italy's top team before winning the CL...this year.
I know which one I think is more likely to happen.
Don't be too sure. Lucio is, afterall, a mix of an orangutan and a giraffe ...
As I said, Ronaldinho gets one good out of two-three. And Seedorf's consistency is more important than Ronaldinho's because he should be the one to control and dictate the game, link up midfield with attack. In a bad game by Ronaldinho, if Seedorf plays well Milan have chances and getting the ball to Ronaldinho he might pull off a moment of magic, but if Seedorf is crap like most of the time, Milan suffer a lot more.
Exactly how is one player's consistency more important than another's? Every player has an equal responsibility to give their best and be consistent ... Or are you trying to say that Clarence is more important to Milan than Dinho?
I'll tell you what I think. Kaka' used to drive Milan forward, but Dinho isn't able to do this. Leo played Clarence in the second half as a central AM in a 4-2-3-1 ... Dinho left, Pato right ... It worked, and Clarence + Pirlo were able to drive Milan forward.
However, this was Madrid, who weren't dominating in the center, and if we play against a team like Liverpool or Chelsea, we will struggle. We need some other options in midfield ... and wide players who have pace + are wiling to work defensively.
We should try and get a creative CM soon, but not sooner than an AM who would be an alternative to Dinho ... that should be our priority.